Roberto Bautista Agut and Albert Ramos-Vinolas will play each other in the qualifications of the Mutua Madrid Open for the 10th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roberto Bautista Agut who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Roberto Bautista Agut is the pick to win this match.
Roberto Bautista Agut -> 1.37
Albert Ramos-Vinolas -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roberto Bautista Agut vs. Albert Ramos-Vinolas
This will be the 10th time that Roberto Bautista Agut and Albert Ramos-Vinolas play each other. The head to head is 5-4 for Ramos-Vinolas (see full H2H stats), 5-4 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Bautista-Agut won 6-3 7-6(3) in the semifinal in Kitzbuhel back in 2022.
Highlights Roberto Bautista Agut vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas – Kitzbuhel 29-July-2022
Roberto Bautista Agut
14 - 11win/loss
86
9
LWLWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-13 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-23 | 9-7 | 8-8 | 2-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-20 | 17-9 | 7-3 | 9-6 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-25 | 14-10 | 7-7 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-8 | 13-4 | 4-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 86, Roberto reached the qualifications after beating Amir Omarkhanov 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Roberto had a good straight sets win against Omarkhanov (6-2 6-1). During the match, Bautista-Agut scored 49 points vs Omarkhanov’s 25. Roberto was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bautista-Agut scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Roberto Bautista Agut was quite effective on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 78% (7/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Roberto broke Omarkhanov 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Bautista-Agut has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (337-202). 7-3 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Bautista-Agut has a compiled 84-58 match record in the last years on clay.
The Spaniard has an aggregate 14-11 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
9 - 10win/loss
105
17
LWLWWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-12 | 0-1 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-37 | 1-8 | 30-24 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-28 | 4-7 | 21-15 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-26 | 5-8 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-14 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 105, Ramos-Vinolas got to the qualifications after defeating Diego Schwartzman 3-6 7-63 6-2.
In the qualifications against Schwartzman, The Spaniard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-63 6-2). During the match Ramos-Vinolas scored 95 points vs Schwartzman’s 89. Ramos-Vinolas was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Ramos-Vinolas bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Albert Ramos-Vinolas lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Ramos-Vinolas put 73% of his first serves in, winning 63% (39/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the 2nd serve. Albert broke Schwartzman 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Spaniard’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Murcia Challenger.
The Spaniard has an overall 9-10 win-loss record in 2024, 9-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2021 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bautista-Agut | Ramos-Vinolas |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 30 |
| Pts | 49-25 | 95-89 |
| Total Points | 74 | 184 |
| Winners | 21 | 39 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Both Bautista-Agut and Ramos-Vinolas played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Albert Ramos-Vinolas dropped 1 set while Roberto Bautista Agut hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Bautista-Agut has played 1 set(s) less than Ramos-Vinolas (2 vs 3). Therefore, Bautista-Agut played 15 games less than Ramos-Vinolas. Bautista-Agut scored 21 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Ramos-Vinolas bagged 39 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bautista-Agut | Ramos-Vinolas |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 26/35 | 62/85 |
| %1st in | 74% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 39/62 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 7/9 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 78% | 57% |
Bautista-Agut fired 1 ace . Ramos-Vinolas also struck 2 aces . Bautista-Agut won 81% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 78% of the points. On the other side, Ramos-Vinolas won 63% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bautista-Agut | Ramos-Vinolas |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 71% | 56% |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Roberto broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Roberto pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Albert broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Albert conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bautista-Agut | |||
| Q1 Omarkhanov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 49-25 | 49-25 | |
| Total points | 74 | 74 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ramos-Vinolas | |||
| Q1 Schwartzman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 95-89 | 95-89 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 62/85 | 62/85 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 39/62 | 39/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLWWLL
LWLWWLLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (4-5) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Emilio NavaNava (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Richard GasquetGasquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Christopher EubanksEubanks (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Christian GarinGarin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Marcos GironGiron (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Taro DanielDaniel (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Valentin VacherotVacherot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
