Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Brandon Nakashima will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on PISTA ANDRES GIMENO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Martin Etcheverry is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.61
Brandon Nakashima -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Brandon Nakashima
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Brandon Nakashima since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
9 - 9win/loss
27
27
LLWWWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-11 | 2-4 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-29 | 8-11 | 25-14 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-33 | 4-5 | 48-25 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-29 | 0-2 | 62-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 26-15 | 0-1 | 24-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 30, Etcheverry reached the 3rd round after beating Nick Hardt 7-5 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Tomas Martin had a good straight sets win against Hardt (7-5 6-2). During the match, Etcheverry scored 71 points vs Hardt’s 57. Etcheverry was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Etcheverry bagged 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tomas Martin Etcheverry lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Etcheverry put 79% of his first serves in, winning 70% (38/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (5/14) on the 2nd serve. Tomas Martin broke Hardt 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Etcheverry has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (316-179). 7-5 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Etcheverry has an aggregate274-136 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
Etcheverry’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Houston.
The Argentine has an aggregate 9-9 win-loss record in 2024, 7-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Barcelona
Brandon Nakashima
26 - 9win/loss
81
43
LWWLWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-11 | 11-4 | 6-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-26 | 9-15 | 3-4 | 8-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 17-13 | 5-5 | 9-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-25 | 17-10 | 4-7 | 20-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-14 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 87, the American got to the 3rd round after defeating Daniel Evans 7-65 6-2 and Andrey Rublev 6-4 7-66.
In the 2nd round, Nakashima had a good straight sets win against Rublev (6-4 7-66). During the match Nakashima scored 78 points vs Rublev’s 76. The American was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Nakashima managed to score 6 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Brandon Nakashima was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (33/41) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nakashima broke Rublev once after converting 11% of his break points (1/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Brandon hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Tenerife 1 Challenger where he defeated Pedro Martinez Portero in the final 6-3 6-4.
Nakashima has an overall 26-9 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Barcelona
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Etcheverry | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 44 |
| Pts | 71-57 | 164-150 |
| Total Points | 128 | 314 |
| Winners | 38 | 54 |
| %Winners | 54% | 33% |
Etcheverry played 1 match while Nakashima competed in 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Etcheverry has played 2 set(s) less than Nakashima (2 vs 4). Therefore, Etcheverry played 24 games less than Nakashima. The Argentine scored 38 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, Nakashima recorded 54 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Etcheverry | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 54/68 | 74/143 |
| %1st in | 79% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 38/54 | 54/74 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 5/14 | 41/69 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 59% |
Etcheverry struck 5 aces . Nakashima recorded 9 aces (4.5 per match). Etcheverry won 70% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Nakashima won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Etcheverry | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/21 |
| % Converted | 57% | 24% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Etcheverry broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Etcheverry lost his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Nakashima broke his opponents 5 times with a 24% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Etcheverry | |||
| R2 Hardt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 71-57 | 71-57 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 54/68 | 54/68 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 38/54 | 38/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nakashima | ||||
| R1 Evans |
R2 Rublev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 23 | 44 | |
| pts | 86-74 | 78-76 | 164-150 | |
| Total points | 160 | 154 | 314 | |
| Winners | 21 | 33 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 24% | 42% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/68 | 41/75 | 74/143 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 55% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 21/33 | 33/41 | 54/74 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 80% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/35 | 19/34 | 41/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 56% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 1/9 | 5/21 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 11% | 24% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 1/1 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWLWW
LWWLWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Barcelona
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Rafael NadalNadal (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Tomas MachacMachac (w/o) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-0 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Nicolas JarryJarry (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Ugo HumbertHumbert (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Sebastian BaezBaez (5-7 7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Borna CoricCoric (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Nick HardtHardt (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Harold MayotMayot (7-63 6-76 ret.) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Andrey RublevRublev (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-0 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Rafael NadalNadal (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-4 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Ugo HumbertHumbert (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Nicolas JarryJarry (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Cameron NorrieNorrie (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Casper RuudRuud (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
