Jesper De Jong and Valentin Royer will face off in the 2nd round of the Oeiras 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on CAMPO 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.52
Valentin Royer -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Valentin Royer
There is no head to head record between Jesper De Jong and Valentin Royer since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jesper De Jong
12 - 8win/loss
156
135
WLWWLWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-10 | 7-3 | 8-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 158, the Dutch got to the 2nd round after defeating Gauthier Onclin 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Onclin (6-3 6-2). During the match, De Jong scored 64 points vs Onclin’s 43. Jesper was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Jong recorded 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jesper De Jong was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (25/32) of his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. De Jong broke Onclin 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
De Jong has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (217-130). 5-3 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, De Jong has a composed117-66 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
De Jong has an aggregate 12-8 win-loss record in 2024, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Oeiras 3 Challenger
De Jong has never competed in this tournament before.
Valentin Royer
17 - 8win/loss
228
228
LWWLWWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-10 | 2-1 | 13-3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-20 | 24-7 | 22-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-25 | 8-4 | 30-15 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-17 | 1-2 | 13-8 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-15 | 4-4 | 4-3 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 262, Royer reached the 2nd round after beating Orlando Luz 7-65 3-6 6-3, Javier Barranco Cosano 6-72 6-2 7-64 and Adrian Andreev 6-0 5-7 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player defeated Andreev (6-0 5-7 6-4). During the match Royer scored 95 points vs Andreev’s 77. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Royer made 5 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Valentin Royer lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Royer put 67% of his first serves in, winning 73% (41/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Andreev 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Royer’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Royer has an aggregate 17-8 win-loss record in 2024, 9-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Jong | Royer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 93 |
| Pts | 64-43 | 307-275 |
| Total Points | 107 | 582 |
| Winners | 25 | 128 |
| %Winners | 39% | 42% |
De Jong played 1 match while Royer competed in 3 matches. Royer started his run from the qualifications while De Jong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Valentin Royer surrendered 3 sets while Jesper De Jong hasn’t conceded a set so far. De Jong has played 7 set(s) less than Royer (2 vs 9). Therefore, De Jong played 76 games less than Royer. Jesper scored 25 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Valentin made 128 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Jong | Royer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 32/54 | 175/282 |
| %1st in | 59% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 128/175 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 57/107 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 53% |
De Jong made 6 aces . Royer struck 19 aces (6.3 per match). De Jong won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Royer won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Jong | Royer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 12 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 12/31 |
| % Converted | 75% | 39% |
| Conceded | 1 | 22 |
| Saved | 1 | 15 |
| % Saved | 100% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 7 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Dutch pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. The French player broke his opponents 12 times with a 39% conversion rate. Valentin conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Jong | |||
| R1 Onclin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/54 | 32/54 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 25/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Royer | |||||
| Q1 Luz |
Q3 Barranco |
R1 Andreev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 3-6 6-3 | 6-72 6-2 7-64 | 6-0 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 34 | 28 | 93 | |
| pts | 100-102 | 112-96 | 95-77 | 307-275 | |
| Total points | 202 | 208 | 172 | 582 | |
| Winners | 45 | 42 | 41 | 128 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 38% | 43% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 5 | 5 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 64/104 | 55/95 | 56/83 | 175/282 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 58% | 67% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 45/64 | 42/55 | 41/56 | 128/175 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 76% | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 24/40 | 13/27 | 57/107 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 60% | 48% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/15 | 5/8 | 12/31 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 27% | 63% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 4 | 8 | 22 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 2/4 | 6/8 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 50% | 75% | 195% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLWLWWL
LWWLWWWWWL Tennis Scores in Oeiras 3 Challenger
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-0 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Quentin HalysHalys (4-6 7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Mathys ErhardErhard (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Joris De LooreDe Loore (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Billy HarrisHarris (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-1 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-2 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Henrique RochaRocha (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-2 3-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (7-5 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Joris De LooreDe Loore (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Jozef KovalikKovalik (7-6(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Henrique RochaRocha (6-3 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Mathys ErhardErhard (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-0 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-1 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-2 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Quentin HalysHalys (4-6 7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Dennis NovakNovak (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
