Roberto Cid Subervi and David Pichler will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Merida Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CANCHA MERIDA. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roberto Cid Subervi who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Roberto Cid Subervi is the pick to win this match.
Roberto Cid Subervi -> 1.41
David Pichler -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roberto Cid Subervi vs. David Pichler
There is no head to head record between Roberto Cid Subervi and David Pichler since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Roberto Cid Subervi
15 - 5win/loss
393
211
LWWWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-21 | 21-6 | 23-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-18 | 22-9 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-8 | 14-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-30 | 6-12 | 4-15 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 0-3 | 6-8 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 432, Cid reached the 2nd round after defeating Aidan Mayo 6-2 3-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, Cid defeated Mayo (6-2 3-6 6-1). During the match, Cid scored 66 points vs Mayo’s 57. Roberto was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cid wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Roberto Cid Subervi lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Cid put 68% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the 2nd serve. Roberto broke Mayo 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Cid has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (232-163). 6-2 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Cid has a composed 115-81 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Cid’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Wesley Chapel.
Cid has a compiled 14-5 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Merida Challenger
Cid has never competed in this tournament before.
David Pichler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-23 | 4-8 | 11-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-33 | 5-7 | 23-23 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 11-5 | 32-23 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-27 | 2-2 | 28-22 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-17 | 16-11 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 563, David got to the 2nd round after beating Christian Langmo 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Austrian defeated Langmo (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match Pichler scored 89 points vs Langmo’s 79. Pichler was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Pichler bagged 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, David Pichler was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (40/51) of his 1st serve and 66% (19/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. David broke Langmo twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
David’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Bhopal.
David has a composed 6-6 win-loss record in 2024, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cid | Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 28 |
| Pts | 66-57 | 89-79 |
| Total Points | 123 | 168 |
| Winners | 31 | 40 |
| %Winners | 47% | 45% |
Both Cid and Pichler played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Roberto Cid Subervi dropped 1 set, while David Pichler surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Cid and Pichler have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Cid played 4 games less than Pichler. Cid scored 31 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, David fired 40 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cid | Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 44/65 | 51/80 |
| %1st in | 68% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 40/51 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 19/29 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 66% |
Cid didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pichler managed to score 4 aces . Cid won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Pichler won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cid | Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 83% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 33% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Roberto broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. The Dominican dropped his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Pichler broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Austrian conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cid | |||
| R1 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 66-57 | 66-57 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 44/65 | 44/65 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Pichler | |||
| R1 Langmo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 89-79 | 89-79 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 51/80 | 51/80 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 40/51 | 40/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWWW
LLWLLLWLWW Tennis Scores in Merida Challenger
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Preston BrownBrown (6-71 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez – Alan Fernando Rubio FierrosFernando Rubio Fierros (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- David PichlerPichler – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Louis WesselsWessels (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Dan MartinMartin (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jacob BrummBrumm – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (7-60 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Emiliano AguileraAguilera (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Ozan BarisBaris (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Aidan MayoMayo (6-2 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Federico GaioGaio (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Antoine BellierBellier (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jacob BrummBrumm – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (7-6(0) 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Louis WesselsWessels (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez – Alan Fernando Rubio FierrosFernando Rubio Fierros (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – David PichlerPichler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob BrummBrumm – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Hernandez SerranoHernandez Serrano – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-1) – H2H and prediction
