Nerman Fatic and Franco Agamenone will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Szekesfehervar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Franco Agamenone is the pick to win this match.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.87
Nerman Fatic -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Franco Agamenone
There is no head to head record between Nerman Fatic and Franco Agamenone since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-10 | 3-3 | 2-7 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 194, Fatic reached the 2nd round after beating Pablo Llamas Ruiz 6-4 6-75 6-0.
In the 1st round, Nerman defeated Llamas Ruiz (6-4 6-75 6-0). During the match, Fatic scored 103 points vs Llamas Ruiz’s 82. Nerman was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fatic managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 69% of his first serves in, winning 76% (45/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Nerman broke Llamas Ruiz 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Fatic has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (295-197). 1-0 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fatic has a compiled 249-150 match record in the last years on clay.
The Bosnian has a composed 5-3 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szekesfehervar Challenger
Nerman has never competed in this tournament before.
Franco Agamenone
4 - 7win/loss
220
108
LWLWLWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 1-4 | 6-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 200, Franco reached the 2nd round after defeating Abedallah Shelbayh 7-62 6-0.
In the 1st round, Agamenone had a good straight sets win against Shelbayh (7-62 6-0). During the match Agamenone scored 67 points vs Shelbayh’s 45. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Agamenone struck 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Franco Agamenone was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (25/34) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Franco broke Shelbayh 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Agamenone has an overall 3-7 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fatic | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 19 |
| Pts | 103-82 | 67-45 |
| Total Points | 185 | 112 |
| Winners | 45 | 25 |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% |
Both Fatic and Agamenone played 1 match. At the moment, Nerman Fatic conceded 1 set while Franco Agamenone hasn’t conceded a set so far. Fatic has played 1 set more than Agamenone (3 vs 2). Therefore, Fatic played 10 games more than Agamenone. Fatic scored 45 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian struck 25 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fatic | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 2 |
| 1st in | 59/86 | 34/57 |
| %1st in | 69% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 45/59 | 25/34 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 15/23 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 65% |
Fatic struck 9 aces . Agamenone struck 2 aces . Fatic won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Agamenone won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fatic | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 55% | 80% |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Bosnian broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Bosnian lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Franco broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Franco conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Llamas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 103-82 | 103-82 | |
| Total points | 185 | 185 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 59/86 | 59/86 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 45/59 | 45/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Agamenone | |||
| R1 Shelbayh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-45 | 67-45 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 34/57 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLLWL
LWLWLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Szekesfehervar Challenger
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (1-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Filip MisolicMisolic (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Peter FajtaFajta (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Matyas FueleFuele (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Gerald MelzerMelzer (6-3 4-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Richard GasquetGasquet (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Mate ValkuszValkusz (4-6 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Attila BorosBoros (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (6-4 6-75 6-0) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-72 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-62 6-0) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Manuel GuinardGuinard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Zsombor PirosPiros (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Jozef KovalikKovalik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-2) – H2H and prediction
