Emilio Nava and Patrick Brady will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 7:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.25
Patrick Brady -> 3.68
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Patrick Brady
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Patrick Brady since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-11 | 11-7 | 1-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 150, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Gabi Adrian Boitan 7-64 6-1.
In the 1st round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Adrian Boitan (7-64 6-1). During the match, Nava scored 68 points vs Adrian Boitan’s 47. Nava was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava bagged 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Emilio Nava was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (25/30) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Adrian Boitan 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Nava has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (156-102). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nava has a composed21-18 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The American has an overall 3-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Patrick Brady
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 15-10 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-12 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 816, Patrick got to the 2nd round after defeating Jaimee Floyd Angele 6-3 6-4, Collin Altamirano 6-3 6-2 and Lucas Gerch 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Gerch (6-3 6-2). During the match Brady scored 58 points vs Gerch’s 37. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Brady wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Patrick Brady was very efficient on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Brady broke Gerch 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Brady has a compiled 7-3 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Brady |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 53 |
| Pts | 68-47 | 198-145 |
| Total Points | 115 | 343 |
| Winners | 25 | 82 |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% |
Nava played 1 match while Brady competed in 3 matches. Brady started his run from the qualifications while Nava had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Nava has played 4 set(s) less than Brady (2 vs 6). Therefore, Nava played 33 games less than Brady. Emilio scored 25 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Brady recorded 82 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Brady |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 0.7 |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 112/162 |
| %1st in | 59% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 82/112 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 23/50 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 46% |
Nava managed to score 6 aces . Brady managed to score 2 aces (0.7 per match). Nava won 83% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Brady won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Brady |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 14/34 |
| % Converted | 40% | 41% |
| Conceded | 1 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 45% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Brady broke his opponents 14 times with a 41% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| R1 Adrian |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-47 | 68-47 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 30/51 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Brady | |||||
| Q1 Floyd |
Q3 Altamirano |
R1 Gerch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 17 | 53 | |
| pts | 68-53 | 72-55 | 58-37 | 198-145 | |
| Total points | 121 | 127 | 95 | 343 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | 24 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 40% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 40/59 | 40/59 | 32/44 | 112/162 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | 73% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | 24/32 | 82/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | 75% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 7/19 | 7/12 | 23/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 37% | 58% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/18 | 5/8 | 14/34 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 28% | 63% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 2 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 3/5 | 0/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 60% | 0% | 110% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWWW
LWWWLLWWLW Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Denis KudlaKudla – Noah RubinRubin (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-0 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Denis KudlaKudla (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
