Hayden Jones and Luke Saville will play each other in the 2nd round of the Burnie 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luke Saville who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Luke Saville is the pick to win this match.
Luke Saville -> 1.29
Hayden Jones -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hayden Jones vs. Luke Saville
There is no head to head record between Hayden Jones and Luke Saville since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Hayden Jones
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-8 | 3-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Hayden got to the 2nd round after defeating Yuki Mochizuki 4-6 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round against Mochizuki, Jones recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-2). During the match, Jones scored 110 points vs Mochizuki’s 87. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jones made 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Hayden Jones was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 75% (46/61) of his 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Australian broke Mochizuki 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Jones has a unfavourable match record in the last 3 years having won 30% of his matches (6-14). 1-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jones has a composed6-11 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
Jones has a compiled 1-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 1 Challenger
Hayden has never competed in this tournament before.
Luke Saville
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-11 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-11 | 18-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 311, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Tristan Schoolkate 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, Luke had a good straight sets win against Schoolkate (6-3 6-0). During the match Saville scored 51 points vs Schoolkate’s 33. Saville was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Saville was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Luke Saville lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Saville put 62% of his first serves in, winning 69% (18/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (8/16) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Schoolkate 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Luke has a composed 1-2 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jones | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 15 |
| Pts | 110-87 | 51-33 |
| Total Points | 197 | 84 |
| Winners | 46 | 18 |
| %Winners | 42% | 35% |
Both Jones and Saville played 1 match. At the moment, Hayden Jones lost 1 set while Luke Saville hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Jones has played 1 set more than Saville (3 vs 2). Therefore, Jones played 15 games more than Saville. The Australian scored 46 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Luke bagged 18 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jones | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 0 |
| 1st in | 61/100 | 26/42 |
| %1st in | 61% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 46/61 | 18/26 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 8/16 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 50% |
Jones managed to score 4 aces . Saville didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Jones won 75% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Saville won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jones | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 57% | 67% |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 71% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jones | |||
| R1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 110-87 | 110-87 | |
| Total points | 197 | 197 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 61/100 | 61/100 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 46/61 | 46/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Saville | |||
| R1 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 51-33 | 51-33 | |
| Total points | 84 | 84 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 18/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 8/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLWLL
LLLWWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Burnie 1 Challenger
- Alex BoltBolt – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – James McCabeMcCabe (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (6-3 4-6 7-69) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Alex BoltBolt (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Marc PolmansPolmans (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shintaro ImaiImai – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Dane SweenySweeny (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Omar JasikaJasika (1-0) – H2H and prediction
