Beibit Zhukayev and Nino Serdarusic will face off in the 2nd round of the Champaign Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Beibit Zhukayev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Beibit Zhukayev is the pick to win this match.
Beibit Zhukayev -> 1.48
Nino Serdarusic -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Beibit Zhukayev vs. Nino Serdarusic
This will be the 2nd time that Beibit Zhukayev and Nino Serdarusic play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Zhukayev (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Zhukayev won 6-3 6-4 in the quarter in the Charlottesville Challenger back in November 2023.
Beibit Zhukayev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-9 | 5-6 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 187 (career-high), Zhukayev reached the 2nd round after defeating Enrico Dalla Valle 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Kazakhstani had a good straight sets win against Dalla Valle (6-1 6-1). During the match, Zhukayev scored 60 points vs Dalla Valle’s 30. Zhukayev was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zhukayev bagged 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Beibit Zhukayev was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zhukayev broke Dalla Valle 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Zhukayev has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 53% of his matches (138-122). 11-7 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Zhukayev has a compiled22-20 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Charlottesville Challenger where he defeated Aidan Mayo in the final 6-3 6-4.
The Kazakhstani has an overall 37-29 win-loss record in 2023, 11-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Zhukayev has never competed in this tournament before.
Nino Serdarusic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-9 | 1-2 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-33 | 0-4 | 26-23 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-34 | 6-6 | 17-20 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-33 | 0-0 | 23-25 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-14 | 3-2 | 6-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 305, the Croatian reached the 2nd round after beating Aidan Mayo 6-3 1-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Croatian defeated Mayo (6-3 1-6 6-3). During the match Serdarusic scored 89 points vs Mayo’s 82. Nino was extremely aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Serdarusic made 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Nino Serdarusic lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Serdarusic put 68% of his first serves in, winning 77% (48/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 34% (10/29) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Mayo twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Nino’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Szekesfehervar Challenger.
The Croatian has a composed 29-32 win-loss record in 2023, 3-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhukayev | Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 25 |
| Pts | 60-30 | 89-82 |
| Total Points | 90 | 171 |
| Winners | 18 | 48 |
| %Winners | 30% | 54% |
Both Zhukayev and Serdarusic played 1 match. At the moment, Nino Serdarusic surrendered 1 set while Beibit Zhukayev hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Zhukayev has played 1 set(s) less than Serdarusic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Zhukayev played 11 games less than Serdarusic. Zhukayev scored 18 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, The Croatian scored 48 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhukayev | Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 10 |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 62/91 |
| %1st in | 55% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 48/62 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 10/29 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 34% |
Zhukayev fired 5 aces . Serdarusic scored 10 aces . Zhukayev won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Serdarusic won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 34% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhukayev | Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 63% | 33% |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Beibit broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Kazakhstani extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. Serdarusic broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Nino conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zhukayev | |||
| R1 Dalla Valle |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 60-30 | 60-30 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 24/44 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Serdarusic | |||
| R1 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 89-82 | 89-82 | |
| Total points | 171 | 171 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 62/91 | 62/91 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 48/62 | 48/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/29 | 10/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 34% | 34% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLWWLWWL
LLWWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Emilio NavaNava (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi – Hunter HeckHeck (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre (5-7 6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Chris RodeschRodesch (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse (6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Alfredo PerezPerez (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Denis KudlaKudla (6-74 7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (7-5 5-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Gabriel DebruDebru (7-67 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Karlis OzolinsOzolins – Stefan KozlovKozlov (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi – Hunter HeckHeck (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse (6-1 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Denis KudlaKudla (6-7(4) 7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Chris RodeschRodesch (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Alfredo PerezPerez (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Alex RybakovRybakov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Karlis OzolinsOzolins (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
