Laura Siegemund and Jana Cepelova will square off in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court 9. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Laura Siegemund who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Laura Siegemund is the pick to win this match.
Laura Siegemund -> 1.26
Jana Cepelova -> 3.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Laura Siegemund vs. Jana Cepelova
This will be the 2nd time that Laura Siegemund and Jana Cepelova play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Siegemund (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Siegemund won 6-3 6-3 in the 1st round in the Osprey.
Laura Siegemund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 7-5 | 6-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-17 | 23-13 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 3-5 | 15-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-14 | 7-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-9 | 11-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 154, the German got to the qualifications after beating Arina Rodionova 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Siegemund had a good straight sets win against Rodionova (6-2 6-1). During the match, Siegemund scored 65 points vs Rodionova’s 44. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Siegemund wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the encounter and she committed only 5 double faults. Laura Siegemund conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Siegemund put 71% of her first serves in, winning 73% (30/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Rodionova 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Siegemund has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of her matches (269-170). 3-1 on grass in 2023. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Siegemund has an overall 11-9 match record in the last years on grass.
The German has a composed 16-12 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Jana Cepelova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 35-23 | 17-10 | 6-8 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 897, Jana got to the qualifications after defeating Olga Danilovic 7-5 7-68.
In the qualifications, Cepelova had a good straight sets win against Danilovic (7-5 7-68). During the match Cepelova scored 88 points vs Danilovic’s 82. Jana was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Cepelova couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Jana Cepelova lost the serve 4 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Cepelova put 73% of her first serves in, winning 59% (39/66) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Jana broke Danilovic 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Jana has a compiled 1-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Siegemund | Cepelova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 25 |
| Pts | 65-44 | 88-82 |
| Total Points | 109 | 170 |
| Winners | 30 | 39 |
| %Winners | 46% | 44% |
Both Siegemund and Cepelova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Siegemund and Cepelova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Siegemund played 10 games less than Cepelova. The German scored 30 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovakian made 39 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Siegemund | Cepelova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 41/58 | 66/90 |
| %1st in | 71% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 39/66 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 59% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 11/24 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 46% |
Siegemund didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cepelova also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Siegemund won 73% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Cepelova won 59% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Siegemund | Cepelova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 56% |
| Conceded | 4 | 11 |
| Saved | 4 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The German broke her opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Siegemund pretty effective on her serve as she has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. Cepelova broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Jana conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded.
| Siegemund | |||
| Q1 Rodionova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/58 | 41/58 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cepelova | |||
| Q1 Danilovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 88-82 | 88-82 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 66/90 | 66/90 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 39/66 | 39/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWWL
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Luis Diego Chavez VillalpandoDiego Chavez Villalpando (6-4 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando YamacitaYamacita – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Esteban BrunaBruna (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Simon NavarroNavarro (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Agustin Suarez GonzalezSuarez Gonzalez (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez – Nicolas Alberto ArrecheAlberto Arreche (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Lorenzo GagliardoGagliardo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana CepelovaCepelova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
