![Prediction And Head To Head Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Vs. Vitaliy Sachko Qdyjip3wqg Prediction and head to head Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs. Vitaliy Sachko](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Matheus-Pucinelli-De-Almeida-vs.-Vitaliy-Sachko-QdyJIp3WQg.jpg)
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida and Vitaliy Sachko will play each other in the qualifications of the Prostejov Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida is the pick to win this match.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida -> 1.7
Vitaliy Sachko -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs. Vitaliy Sachko
There is no head to head record between Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida and Vitaliy Sachko since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 20-25 | 1-3 | 19-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-29 | 1-3 | 27-24 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 72-29 | 0-0 | 72-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-9 | 13-7 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 249, Pucinelli De Almeida got to the qualifications after beating Gerald Melzer 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Pucinelli De Almeida had a good straight sets win against Melzer (6-4 6-4). During the match, Pucinelli De Almeida scored 74 points vs Melzer’s 59. Matheus was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pucinelli De Almeida bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Pucinelli De Almeida put 64% of his first serves in, winning 57% (26/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. Pucinelli De Almeida broke Melzer 7 times after converting 78% of his break points (7/9).
Pucinelli De Almeida has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (156-97). 10-7 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pucinelli De Almeida has an aggregate135-80 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Coquimbo Challenger where he beat Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva in the final 7-6(1) 6-7(4) 6-4.
Matheus has an overall 10-8 win-loss record in 2023, 10-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prostejov Challenger
Vitaliy Sachko
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 8-13 | 3-3 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
2020 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 275, Sachko reached the qualifications after defeating Milos Karol 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sachko had a good straight sets win against Karol (6-3 6-2). During the match Sachko scored 64 points vs Karol’s 46. The Ukrainian was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Sachko couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Vitaliy Sachko lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Sachko put 63% of his first serves in, winning 77% (30/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (8/23) on the 2nd serve. Sachko broke Karol 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Sachko has an overall 26-15 win-loss record in 2023, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prostejov Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Pucinelli De Almeida | Sachko |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 17 |
Pts | 74-59 | 64-46 |
Total Points | 133 | 110 |
Winners | 26 | 30 |
%Winners | 35% | 47% |
Both Pucinelli De Almeida and Sachko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pucinelli De Almeida and Sachko have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Pucinelli De Almeida played 3 games more than Sachko. Matheus scored 26 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian blasted 30 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Pucinelli De Almeida | Sachko |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 0 |
Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
1st in | 46/72 | 39/62 |
%1st in | 64% | 63% |
1st pts | 26/46 | 30/39 |
%1st pts | 57% | 77% |
2nd pts | 12/26 | 8/23 |
%2nd pts | 46% | 35% |
Pucinelli De Almeida blasted 2 aces . Sachko didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pucinelli De Almeida won 57% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Sachko won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 35% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Pucinelli De Almeida | Sachko |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 5 |
Converted | 7/9 | 5/10 |
% Converted | 78% | 50% |
Conceded | 8 | 9 |
Saved | 3 | 7 |
% Saved | 38% | 78% |
Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The Brazilian broke his opponent 7 times with a 78% conversion rate. Matheus dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded. Sachko broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
Pucinelli De Almeida | |||
Q1 Melzer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 74-59 | 74-59 | |
Total points | 133 | 133 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 46/72 | 46/72 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 26/46 | 26/46 | |
% 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
2nd pts | 12/26 | 12/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
Converted % | 78% | 78% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Sachko | |||
Q1 Karol |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 64-46 | 64-46 | |
Total points | 110 | 110 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 39/62 | 39/62 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 8/23 | 8/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 35% | 35% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Elias YmerYmer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction