Brandon Nakashima and Sam Querrey will play each other in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Nakashima who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Nakashima is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.53
Sam Querrey -> 2.58
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Nakashima vs. Sam Querrey
This will be the 2nd time that Brandon Nakashima and Sam Querrey fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nakashima (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Nakashima won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in Los cabos back in 2021.
Brandon Nakashima
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-11 | 11-4 | 7-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-26 | 9-15 | 3-4 | 8-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 17-13 | 5-5 | 9-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-25 | 17-10 | 4-7 | 20-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-14 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 64, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Tommy Paul 6-74 7-65 7-62.
In the 1st round against Paul, Nakashima recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 7-65 7-62). During the match, Nakashima scored 138 points vs Paul’s 132. Brandon was very aggressive to blast 65 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nakashima recorded 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Brandon Nakashima was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (65/82) of his 1st serve and 57% (25/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Nakashima broke Paul once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Nakashima has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (117-70). 3-1 on grass in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Nakashima has a composed7-4 match record in the last 7 years on grass.
Nakashima has a composed 14-14 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Brandon has never competed in this tournament before.
Sam Querrey
5 - 9win/loss
329
11
LLLLLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8-14 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-16 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 26-17 | 7-10 | 3-1 | 8-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 24-23 | 12-14 | 3-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 107, Querrey reached the 2nd round after defeating Bernard Tomic 6-4 6-4, Pierre-Hugues Herbert 6-74 6-4 6-3 and Robin Haase 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Haase (6-3 6-2). During the match Querrey scored 67 points vs Haase’s 45. The American was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Querrey fired 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sam Querrey was very efficient on serve to win 96% (26/27) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sam broke Haase 3 times after converting 21% of his break points (3/14).
Querrey has an overall 5-8 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nakashima | Querrey |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 69 |
| Pts | 138-132 | 249-206 |
| Total Points | 270 | 455 |
| Winners | 65 | 120 |
| %Winners | 47% | 48% |
Nakashima played 1 match while Querrey competed in 3 matches. Querrey started his run from the qualifications while Nakashima had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Brandon Nakashima dropped 1 set, while Sam Querrey surrendered 1 set. Nakashima has played 4 set(s) less than Querrey (3 vs 7). Therefore, Nakashima played 30 games less than Querrey. Nakashima scored 65 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Sam fired 120 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nakashima | Querrey |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 38 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 12.7 |
| 1st in | 82/126 | 138/211 |
| %1st in | 65% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 65/82 | 120/138 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 25/44 | 34/73 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 47% |
Nakashima struck 8 aces . Querrey struck 38 aces (12.7 per match). Nakashima won 79% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Querrey won 87% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nakashima | Querrey |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 8 |
| Converted | 1/6 | 8/31 |
| % Converted | 17% | 26% |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 |
| Saved | 4 | 8 |
| % Saved | 80% | 89% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Nakashima broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. Brandon lost his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 8 times with a 26% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nakashima | |||
| R1 Paul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 7-65 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 39 | 39 | |
| pts | 138-132 | 138-132 | |
| Total points | 270 | 270 | |
| Winners | 65 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 82/126 | 82/126 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 65/82 | 65/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/44 | 25/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Querrey | |||||
| Q1 Tomic |
Q3 Herbert |
R1 Haase |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-74 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 32 | 17 | 69 | |
| pts | 75-58 | 107-103 | 67-45 | 249-206 | |
| Total points | 133 | 210 | 112 | 455 | |
| Winners | 33 | 61 | 26 | 120 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 57% | 39% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 21 | 8 | 9 | 38 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 36/56 | 75/111 | 27/44 | 138/211 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 68% | 61% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 33/36 | 61/75 | 26/27 | 120/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 81% | 96% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 14/36 | 10/17 | 34/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 39% | 59% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/11 | 3/14 | 8/31 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 27% | 21% | 26% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 0 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 6/7 | 0/0 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 86% | – | 186% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLWWLWW
Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Tommy PaulPaul (6-74 7-65 7-62) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (4-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Matthew EbdenEbden (7-64 7-69) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Andreas SeppiSeppi (7-64 7-69) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Jesper De JongDe Jong (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Robin HaaseHaase (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-3 6-78 6-1) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Aljaz BedeneBedene (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Gilles SimonSimon (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
