Daniel Evans and Jeremy Chardy will face off in the semifinal of the Murray River Open for the 4th time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:30 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Evans is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Evans -> 1.77
Jeremy Chardy -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Jeremy Chardy
This will be the 4th time that Daniel Evans and Jeremy Chardy play each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Chardy (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Chardy won 6-4 7-63 in the semifinal in the Surbiton Challenger back in 2018.
Daniel Evans
Ranked no. 33, Evans reached the semifinal after beating Pedro Sousa 6-3 7-5, Marcos Giron 6-4 7-64 and Borna Coric 7-5 7-61.
In the quarter, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Coric (7-5 7-61). During the match Evans scored 84 points vs Coric’s 76. Evans was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Evans struck 14 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Daniel Evans was quite effective on serve to win 84% (41/49) of his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniel broke Coric once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Evans has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 66% of his matches (328-170). 3-0 on hard in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Evans has a 155-75 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Evans has a 3-0 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Melbourne
Evans surrendered in the 2nd round to Yoshihito Nishioka.
Jeremy Chardy
Ranked no. 66, the French player got to the semifinal after defeating Marin Cilic 2-6 6-3 7-68, Gilles Simon 6-3 6-4, Taylor Harry Fritz 6-2 6-4 and Stan Wawrinka w/o.
In the quarter, The French player defeated Wawrinka (w/o). During the match Chardy and Wawrinka scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 33 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Chardy was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jeremy Chardy conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of his first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jeremy has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Chardy’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Antalya.
The French player has a 6-1 win-loss record in 2021, 6-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Melbourne
The French player surrendered in the 1st round to David Goffin.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Evans | Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 69 | 67 |
| Pts | 237-208 | 217-199 |
| Total Points | 445 | 416 |
| Winners | 115 | 102 |
| %Winners | 49% | 47% |
Both Evans and Chardy played 3 matches. At the moment, Jeremy Chardy surrendered 1 set while Daniel Evans hasn’t dropped a set so far. Evans has played 1 set(s) less than Chardy (6 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that Evans played 2 games more than Chardy. Daniel scored 115 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Chardy scored 102 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Evans | Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 8.7 | 6.7 |
| 1st in | 146/233 | 138/217 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 115/146 | 102/138 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 42/87 | 39/79 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 49% |
Evans bagged 26 aces (8.7 per match). Chardy scored 20 aces (6.7 per match). Evans won 79% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Chardy won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Evans | Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 10 |
| Converted | 8/15 | 10/16 |
| % Converted | 53% | 63% |
| Conceded | 17 | 20 |
| Saved | 13 | 14 |
| % Saved | 76% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 6 |
Daniel broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. Evans surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. Chardy broke his opponents 10 times with a 63% conversion rate. Chardy conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Evans | |||||
| R2 Sousa |
R3 Giron |
1/4 Coric |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-4 7-64 | 7-5 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 23 | 25 | 69 | |
| pts | 75-59 | 78-73 | 84-76 | 237-208 | |
| Total points | 134 | 151 | 160 | 445 | |
| Winners | 36 | 38 | 41 | 115 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 49% | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 14 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 48/78 | 49/79 | 49/76 | 146/233 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | 64% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 36/48 | 38/49 | 41/49 | 115/146 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 78% | 84% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 13/30 | 14/27 | 42/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 43% | 52% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 3/5 | 1/5 | 8/15 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 60% | 20% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | 3 | 17 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5/7 | 3/3 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | 100% | 81% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| Chardy | ||||||
| R1 Cilic |
R2 Simon |
R3 Fritz |
1/4 Wawrinka |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 7-68 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 19 | 18 | 0 | 67 | |
| pts | 100-109 | 63-51 | 54-39 | – | 217-199 | |
| Total points | 209 | 114 | 93 | 0 | 416 | |
| Winners | 48 | 31 | 23 | 102 | ||
| %Winners | 48% | 49% | 43% | NAN% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 13 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | ||
| 1st in | 73/112 | 38/56 | 27/49 | / | 138/217 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 68% | 55% | – | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 48/73 | 31/38 | 23/27 | / | 102/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 82% | 85% | – | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/39 | 10/18 | 13/22 | / | 39/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 56% | 59% | – | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/4 | 4/6 | / | 10/16 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 67% | – | 63% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 1 | 4 | 20 | ||
| Saved | 10/15 | 1/1 | 3/4 | 0/ | 14 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 75% | – | 81% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWL
Tennis Scores in Melbourne
- Daniel EvansEvans – Borna CoricCoric (7-5 7-61) – See score progression
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Jiri VeselyVesely (7-63 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jeremy ChardyChardy – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (w/o) – See score progression
- Jeremy ChardyChardy – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (w/o) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Borna CoricCoric (7-5 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Jiri VeselyVesely (7-6(3) 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jeremy ChardyChardy – Daniel EvansEvans (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Corentin MoutetMoutet (3-0) – H2H and prediction
