Colin Sinclair and Matthew Hulme will play each other in the 1st round of the Brisbane 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on SHOW COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Colin Sinclair who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Colin Sinclair is the pick to win this match.
Colin Sinclair -> 1.55
Matthew Hulme -> 2.26
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Colin Sinclair vs. Matthew Hulme
There is no head to head record between Colin Sinclair and Matthew Hulme since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Colin Sinclair
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 42-26 | 25-22 | 5-1 | 3-2 | 9-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 26-26 | 23-25 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 22-17 | 18-15 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-32 | 31-25 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-22 | 22-14 | 7-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 792, the Australian reached the 1st round after defeating Enzo Aguiard 7-6(3) 7-6(5) and Jamie Mackenzie 2-6 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Mackenzie, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Sinclair scored 74 points vs Mackenzie’s 72. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sinclair fired 16 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Colin Sinclair was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (35/45) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Colin was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Mackenzie 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Sinclair started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 1 set in this event to win 51% of the points he played.
ATP Brisbane 2 Challenger - Colin Sinclair's projected path
Sinclair has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (265-187). 3-2 on hard in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sinclair has a composed 165-123 match record in the last years on hard.
Sinclair has a compiled 3-2 win-loss record in 2026, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 2 Challenger
Matthew Hulme
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 22-11 | 16-7 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 11-16 | 10-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-24 | 24-20 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-21 | 13-13 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-11 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 891, the Australian got to the 1st round after defeating Taiyo Yamanaka 4-6 6-4 6-3 and Yuki Mochizuki 5-7 7-5 7-5.
Matthew has an overall 3-3 win-loss record in 2026, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2025 and 2026. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sinclair | Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 54 | 29 |
| Pts | 162-155 | 89-73 |
| Total Points | 317 | 162 |
| Winners | 73 | 42 |
| %Winners | 45% | 47% |
Sinclair played 2 matches while Hulme competed in 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Colin Sinclair surrendered 1 set, while Matthew Hulme dropped 1 set. Sinclair has played 2 sets more than Hulme (5 vs 3). Therefore, Sinclair played 25 games more than Hulme. Colin scored 73 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Matthew blasted 42 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sinclair | Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 9.5 | 12 |
| 1st in | 101/156 | 54/79 |
| %1st in | 65% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 73/101 | 42/54 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 36/55 | 15/25 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 60% |
Sinclair fired 19 aces (9.5 per match). Hulme fired 12 aces . Sinclair won 72% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Hulme won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sinclair | Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 63% | 43% |
| Conceded | 13 | 4 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 62% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponents 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Colin lost his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Hulme conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sinclair | ||||
| Q1 Aguiard |
Q3 Mackenzie |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 7-65 | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 28 | 54 | |
| pts | 88-83 | 74-72 | 162-155 | |
| Total points | 171 | 146 | 317 | |
| Winners | 38 | 35 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 47% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 16 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 56/85 | 45/71 | 101/156 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 63% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 38/56 | 35/45 | 73/101 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 78% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/29 | 16/26 | 36/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 62% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/3 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 100% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 5/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 63% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Hulme | ||||
| Q1 Yamanaka |
Q3 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | 5-7 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 36 | 65 | |
| pts | 89-73 | – | 89-73 | |
| Total points | 162 | 0 | 162 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | ||
| %Winners | 47% | 0% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 12 | 0 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1st in | 54/79 | / | 54/79 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 0% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 42/54 | / | 42/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 0% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | / | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 0% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | ||
| Converted | 3/7 | / | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 0% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | ||
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/ | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | ||
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Brisbane 2 Challenger
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Corentin DenollyDenolly (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Jake DelaneyDelaney (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Omar JasikaJasika – Hikaru ShiraishiShiraishi (4-6 6-2 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Arthur WeberWeber – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-3 2-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Taro DanielDaniel – Dane SweenySweeny (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Matthew HulmeHulme (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Fajing SunSun (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
