Hynek Barton and Michael Vrbensky will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Iasi Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hynek Barton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hynek Barton is the pick to win this match.
Hynek Barton -> 1.46
Michael Vrbensky -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hynek Barton vs. Michael Vrbensky
This will be the 3rd time that Hynek Barton and Michael Vrbensky face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Barton (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Barton won 7-5 4-6 6-3 in the qualifications in the Poznan Challenger back in June 2025.
Hynek Barton
33 - 16win/loss
301
292
LWLLLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-28 | 17-10 | 30-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 9-4 | 21-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 45-26 | 11-5 | 25-16 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 331 (career-high), Hynek got to the qualifications after beating Egor Agafonov 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Agafonov (6-1 7-5). During the match, Barton scored 70 points vs Agafonov’s 51. Hynek was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Barton blasted 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hynek Barton lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Barton put 59% of his first serves in, winning 83% (29/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Agafonov 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Barton has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 64% of his matches (122-69). 19-10 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Barton has a compiled78-43 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Barton’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Doha and M25 Santa margherita di Pula.
The Czech has a composed 33-16 win-loss record in 2025, 19-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Iasi Challenger
Michael Vrbensky
14 - 18win/loss
588
277
LWWWLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-31 | 4-4 | 19-20 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-27 | 4-4 | 32-18 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 58-28 | 11-6 | 44-21 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-27 | 7-3 | 37-16 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 17-24 | 2-1 | 14-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 500, Vrbensky reached the qualifications after beating Matthew Dellavedova 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Dellavedova (6-4 6-2). During the match Vrbensky scored 63 points vs Dellavedova’s 46. Michael was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Vrbensky fired 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Michael Vrbensky was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (25/33) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Czech broke Dellavedova 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Michael’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Opatija.
Vrbensky has a composed 14-18 win-loss record in 2025, 13-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Iasi Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Barton | Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 |
| Pts | 70-51 | 63-46 |
| Total Points | 121 | 109 |
| Winners | 29 | 25 |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% |
Both Barton and Vrbensky played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Barton and Vrbensky have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Barton played 1 game more than Vrbensky. Hynek scored 29 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Michael made 25 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Barton | Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 33/51 |
| %1st in | 59% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 25/33 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 11/18 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 61% |
Barton managed to score 8 aces . Vrbensky managed to score 4 aces . Barton won 83% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Vrbensky won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Barton | Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 40% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Czech broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Hynek dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Michael broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Vrbensky conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Barton | |||
| Q1 Agafonov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 70-51 | 70-51 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 35/59 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Vrbensky | |||
| Q1 Dellavedova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-46 | 63-46 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/51 | 33/51 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 25/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWWLL
LWWWLLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Matias SotoSoto (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Benjamin HassanHassan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Stefan PalosiPalosi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian GimaGima – Florent BaxBax (1-2) – H2H and prediction
