Jessica Pegula and Yulia Putintseva will play each other in the semifinal of the Adelaide International for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 6:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jessica Pegula who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jessica Pegula is the pick to win this match.
Jessica Pegula -> 1.54
Yulia Putintseva -> 2.48
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jessica Pegula vs. Yulia Putintseva
This will be the 3rd time that Jessica Pegula and Yulia Putintseva face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Pegula (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Pegula won 6-4 6-4 in the 2nd round in Montreal back in 2023.
Jessica Pegula
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-16 | 29-9 | 4-2 | 0-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-18 | 45-12 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-21 | 28-15 | 11-4 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-19 | 29-12 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 7, Pegula reached the semifinal after defeating Unknown Player bye, Maria Sakkari 6-4 6-1 and Ashlyn Krueger 6-4 2-0 ret..
In the quarter against Krueger, Jessica had a free pass after Krueger retired on a 6-4 2-0 . scoreline.
Pegula has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 66% of her matches (306-157). 2-0 on hard in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Pegula has a composed 206-90 match record in the last years on hard.
Jessica has a compiled 2-0 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Yulia Putintseva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 40-22 | 22-15 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-27 | 19-17 | 13-8 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-21 | 9-11 | 15-7 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-24 | 14-12 | 12-8 | 5-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 25 (career-high), the Kazakhstani reached the semifinal after beating Donna Vekic 6-2 6-3, Ons Jabeur 6-2 6-4 and Diana Shnaider 7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4.
In the quarter, Yulia defeated Shnaider (7-63 6-79 6-4). During the match Putintseva scored 128 points vs Shnaider’s 125. The Kazakhstani was very aggressive to blast 70 winners.
About the serving games, Putintseva scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Yulia Putintseva lost the serve 4 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Putintseva put 74% of her first serves in, winning 67% (70/105) of the points behind her 1st serve and 39% (14/36) on the 2nd serve. Putintseva broke Shnaider 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Kazakhstani has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
The Kazakhstani has an overall 4-1 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2020. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pegula | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 71 |
| Pts | 104-77 | 271-234 |
| Total Points | 181 | 505 |
| Winners | 39 | 132 |
| %Winners | 38% | 49% |
Pegula played 2 matches while Putintseva competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Yulia Putintseva lost 1 set while Jessica Pegula hasn’t dropped a set so far. Pegula has played 2 set(s) less than Putintseva (5 vs 7). Therefore, Pegula played 42 games less than Putintseva. The American scored 39 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Putintseva made 132 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pegula | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 55/86 | 194/261 |
| %1st in | 64% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 132/194 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 29/67 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 43% |
Pegula blasted 8 aces (4 per match). Putintseva struck 7 aces (2.3 per match). Pegula won 71% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Putintseva won 68% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pegula | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 14 |
| Converted | 8/15 | 14/32 |
| % Converted | 53% | 44% |
| Conceded | 6 | 23 |
| Saved | 4 | 17 |
| % Saved | 67% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
Pegula broke her opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. The American dropped her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Kazakhstani broke her opponents 14 times with a 44% conversion rate. Putintseva conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 74% of the break points that she conceded.
| Pegula | ||||
| R2 Sakkari |
1/4 Krueger |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 2-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 12 | 29 | |
| pts | 60-45 | 44-32 | 104-77 | |
| Total points | 105 | 76 | 181 | |
| Winners | 17 | 22 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 50% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 28/46 | 27/40 | 55/86 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 68% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 17/28 | 22/27 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 81% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 6/13 | 16/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 46% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 2/2 | 8/15 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 100% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Putintseva | |||||
| R1 Vekic |
R2 Jabeur |
1/4 Shnaider |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-63 6-79 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 36 | 71 | |
| pts | 73-56 | 70-53 | 128-125 | 271-234 | |
| Total points | 129 | 123 | 253 | 505 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | 70 | 132 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% | 55% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 48/63 | 41/57 | 105/141 | 194/261 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 72% | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 31/48 | 31/41 | 70/105 | 132/194 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 76% | 67% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 7/16 | 14/36 | 29/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 44% | 39% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/11 | 5/12 | 14/32 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 36% | 42% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 | 12 | 23 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 5/6 | 8/12 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 83% | 67% | 115% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WW
WWWLW Tennis Scores in Adelaide
- Beatriz Haddad Maia/Laura SiegemundHaddad Maia/Laura Siegemund – Anna Danilina/Irina KhromachevaDanilina/Irina Khromacheva (6-2 5-7 10-7) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hanyu Guo/Alexandra PanovaGuo/Alexandra Panova – Ellen Perez/Katerina SiniakovaPerez/Katerina Siniakova (4-6 6-3 11-9) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Orlando LuzLuz – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (4-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rafael MatosMatos – Jordi Samper-MontanaSamper-Montana (6-1 2-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (4-1) – H2H and prediction
