Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Li Tu will play each other in the quarter of the Yokohama Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.68
Li Tu -> 2.08
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Li Tu
This will be the 3rd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Li Tu clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Lam Coleman Wong and Tu (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Lam Coleman Wong won 7-5 6-1 in the quarter in the Lincoln Challenger back in August 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
40 - 34win/loss
161
128
WWLLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-34 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 161, Chak got to the quarter after defeating Lennon Roark Jones 6-2 6-1 and Shintaro Mochizuki 7-6(2) 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Chak had a good straight sets win against Mochizuki (7-62 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 77 points vs Mochizuki’s 67. Chak was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 66% of his first serves in, winning 64% (34/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Mochizuki 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (131-98). 38-24 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed108-70 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Chak’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
The has a composed 40-34 win-loss record in 2024, 38-24 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokohama Challenger
Li Tu
39 - 26win/loss
189
178
WWLWLWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-26 | 33-19 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, Li got to the quarter after beating Yaroslav Demin 6-1 3-0 ret. and Philip Sekulic 7-6(5) 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Li had a good straight sets win against Sekulic (7-65 6-3). During the match Tu scored 78 points vs Sekulic’s 66. Li was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Tu fired 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Li Tu lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Tu put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (34/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Sekulic 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Tu’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Traralgon and the Lexington Challenger.
Li has an aggregate 39-26 win-loss record in 2024, 33-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokohama Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 32 |
| Pts | 137-101 | 117-83 |
| Total Points | 238 | 200 |
| Winners | 53 | 48 |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Tu played 2 matches. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Tu (4 vs 5). However, it’s interesting to notice that Lam Coleman Wong played 5 games more than Tu. The scored 53 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Li fired 48 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 8 |
| 1st in | 76/120 | 66/105 |
| %1st in | 63% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 53/76 | 48/66 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 23/44 | 23/39 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 59% |
Lam Coleman Wong recorded 4 aces (2 per match). Tu struck 16 aces (8 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 70% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Tu won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/18 | 7/14 |
| % Converted | 56% | 50% |
| Conceded | 13 | 8 |
| Saved | 8 | 6 |
| % Saved | 62% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
The broke his opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. The conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Tu broke his opponents 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Li conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Roark Jones |
R2 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 7-62 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 37 | |
| pts | 60-34 | 77-67 | 137-101 | |
| Total points | 94 | 144 | 238 | |
| Winners | 19 | 34 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 44% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 23/40 | 53/80 | 76/120 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 66% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 34/53 | 53/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 64% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 12/27 | 23/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 44% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/8 | 10/18 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 63% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 6/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 60% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Tu | ||||
| R1 Demin |
R2 Sekulic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 3-0 ret. | 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 10 | 22 | 32 | |
| pts | 39-17 | 78-66 | 117-83 | |
| Total points | 56 | 144 | 200 | |
| Winners | 14 | 34 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 44% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 16/26 | 50/79 | 66/105 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 14/16 | 34/50 | 48/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 68% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/10 | 16/29 | 23/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 55% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/5 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 60% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWLWLWW
WWLWLWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benjamin HassanHassan – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
