David Pichler and Inaki Montes-De La Torre will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Montemar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on IVAN NAVARRO COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Inaki Montes-De La Torre who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Inaki Montes-De La Torre is the pick to win this match.
Inaki Montes-De La Torre -> 1.32
David Pichler -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head David Pichler vs. Inaki Montes-De La Torre
There is no head to head record between David Pichler and Inaki Montes-De La Torre since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
David Pichler
17 - 22win/loss
690
390
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-23 | 4-8 | 11-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-33 | 5-7 | 23-23 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2022 | 43-29 | 11-5 | 32-23 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-27 | 2-2 | 28-22 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 18-17 | 16-11 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 594, Pichler got to the qualifications after defeating Nicolas Alvarez Varona 1-6 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Alvarez Varona, Pichler recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-3 6-4).During the match, Pichler scored less points (4) than Alvarez Varona. In fact, the world no. 594 won 81 points vs Alvarez Varona’s. That means that Pichler was more focused during the important points. The Austrian was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pichler fired 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. David Pichler lost the serve 4 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Pichler put 58% of his first serves in, winning 66% (37/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (18/41) on the 2nd serve. David broke Alvarez Varona 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Pichler has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 56% of his matches (318-247). 11-11 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pichler has a compiled194-143 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Austrian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Bhopal.
The Austrian has a composed 17-21 win-loss record in 2024, 11-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montemar Challenger
David has never competed in this tournament before.
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
21 - 10win/loss
553
493
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-12 | 15-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 22-9 | 5-4 | 9-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 22-11 | 8-7 | 7-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-7 | 9-4 | 10-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 684, Inaki reached the qualifications after beating Alex Marti Pujolras 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Montes-De La Torre had a good straight sets win against Marti Pujolras (7-5 6-3). During the match Montes-De La Torre scored 79 points vs Marti Pujolras’s 68. Montes-De La Torre was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Montes-De La Torre wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Inaki Montes-De La Torre lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Montes-De La Torre put 63% of his first serves in, winning 64% (29/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the 2nd serve. Inaki broke Marti Pujolras 5 times after converting 29% of his break points (5/17).
The Spaniard’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Montes-De La Torre has an overall 20-10 win-loss record in 2024, 5-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Pichler | Montes-De La Torre |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 26 | 21 |
Pts | 81-85 | 79-68 |
Total Points | 166 | 147 |
Winners | 37 | 29 |
%Winners | 46% | 37% |
Both Pichler and Montes-De La Torre played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, David Pichler lost 1 set while Inaki Montes-De La Torre hasn’t conceded a set so far. Pichler has played 1 set more than Montes-De La Torre (3 vs 2). Therefore, Pichler played 5 games more than Montes-De La Torre. David scored 37 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Inaki made 29 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Pichler | Montes-De La Torre |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 0 |
Avg per match | 6 | 0 |
1st in | 56/97 | 45/72 |
%1st in | 58% | 63% |
1st pts | 37/56 | 29/45 |
%1st pts | 66% | 64% |
2nd pts | 18/41 | 15/27 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 56% |
Pichler managed to score 6 aces . Montes-De La Torre didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pichler won 66% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Montes-De La Torre won 64% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Pichler | Montes-De La Torre |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/5 | 5/17 |
% Converted | 80% | 29% |
Conceded | 15 | 3 |
Saved | 11 | 1 |
% Saved | 73% | 33% |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
The Austrian broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. David dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Inaki broke his opponent 5 times with a 29% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
Pichler | |||
Q1 Alvarez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 81-85 | 81-85 | |
Total points | 166 | 166 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 56/97 | 56/97 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 18/41 | 18/41 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
Saved | 11/15 | 11 | |
Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Montes-De La Torre | |||
Q1 Marti Pujolras |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 79-68 | 79-68 | |
Total points | 147 | 147 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 45/72 | 45/72 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/17 | 5/17 | |
Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Carlos TabernerTaberner (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Miguel DamasDamas (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim – (0-0) – H2H and prediction