Jack Pinnington Jones and Patrick Maloney will face off in the 2nd round of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Pinnington Jones who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Pinnington Jones is the pick to win this match.
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.4
Patrick Maloney -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Pinnington Jones vs. Patrick Maloney
There is no head to head record between Jack Pinnington Jones and Patrick Maloney since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jack Pinnington Jones
28 - 11win/loss
394
394
WLLWWWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-11 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 394 (career-high), the Brit reached the 2nd round after beating Mark Lajal 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Pinnington Jones defeated Lajal (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match, Pinnington Jones scored 100 points vs Lajal’s 94. Jack was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pinnington Jones struck 8 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Jack Pinnington Jones lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Pinnington Jones put 56% of his first serves in, winning 68% (40/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (23/46) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Lajal 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Pinnington Jones has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (79-44). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Pinnington Jones has an overall6-6 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Aldershot.
The Brit has a composed 28-11 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Jack has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Maloney
36 - 19win/loss
523
505
WLLWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-19 | 16-9 | 7-2 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-10 | 4-3 | 7-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 523, Patrick reached the 2nd round after beating Edoardo Lavagno 6-2 6-0.
In the 1st round, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Lavagno (6-2 6-0). During the match Maloney scored 54 points vs Lavagno’s 24. The American was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Maloney scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Patrick Maloney was very efficient on serve to win 78% (18/23) of his 1st serve and 91% (10/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Patrick broke Lavagno 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Los Angeles and M25 Edmonton.
Maloney has a compiled 36-19 win-loss record in 2024, 13-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pinnington Jones | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 14 |
| Pts | 100-94 | 54-24 |
| Total Points | 194 | 78 |
| Winners | 40 | 18 |
| %Winners | 40% | 33% |
Both Pinnington Jones and Maloney played 1 match. At the moment, Jack Pinnington Jones dropped 1 set while Patrick Maloney hasn’t dropped a set so far. Pinnington Jones has played 1 set more than Maloney (3 vs 2). Therefore, Pinnington Jones played 13 games more than Maloney. The Brit scored 40 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick recorded 18 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pinnington Jones | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 1 |
| 1st in | 59/105 | 23/34 |
| %1st in | 56% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 18/23 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 23/46 | 10/11 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 91% |
Pinnington Jones fired 8 aces . Maloney bagged 1 ace . Pinnington Jones won 68% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Maloney won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 91% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pinnington Jones | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 40% | 83% |
| Conceded | 9 | 0 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Jack broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Pinnington Jones lost his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Pinnington Jones | |||
| R1 Lajal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 100-94 | 100-94 | |
| Total points | 194 | 194 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 59/105 | 59/105 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/46 | 23/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Maloney | |||
| R1 Lavagno |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 54-24 | 54-24 | |
| Total points | 78 | 78 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 18/23 | 18/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/11 | 10/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 91% | 91% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWWWLLWW
WLLWLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Learner TienTien (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Ezekiel ClarkClark (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Jeremy ZhangZhang (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Felix CorwinCorwin (6-0 7-64) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Tyler ZinkZink (5-7 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Mark LajalLajal (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (4-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Henry SearleSearle (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Jeremy ZhangZhang (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Learner TienTien (6-2 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-6 7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Ezekiel ClarkClark (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jay ClarkeClarke – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
