Kilian Feldbausch and Milos Karol will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Lyon Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Milos Karol who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Milos Karol is the pick to win this match.
Milos Karol -> 1.84
Kilian Feldbausch -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kilian Feldbausch vs. Milos Karol
This will be the 2nd time that Kilian Feldbausch and Milos Karol square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Feldbausch (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Feldbausch won 6-0 6-2 in the 1st round in M15 Trnava back in 2022.
Kilian Feldbausch
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 16-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-17 | 4-2 | 20-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-10 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 415, Kilian got to the qualifications after beating Jelle Sels 6-4 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Feldbausch defeated Sels (6-4 3-6 6-4). During the match, Feldbausch and Sels scored the same amount of points (88). However, the world no. 415 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Swiss was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Feldbausch managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kilian Feldbausch was very efficient on serve to win 74% (40/54) of his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Feldbausch broke Sels 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Feldbausch has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 54% of his matches (44-37). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Feldbausch has an aggregate5-5 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Kilian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Castellon.
Feldbausch has a composed 12-8 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lyon Challenger
Kilian has never competed in this tournament before.
Milos Karol
50 - 28win/loss
422
419
LLWLWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 53-31 | 8-5 | 21-17 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 28-27 | 3-2 | 11-13 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 6-24 | 3-5 | 1-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-18 | 0-0 | 10-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 441 (career-high), the Slovakian reached the qualifications after beating Ricardas Berankis 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Karol had a good straight sets win against Berankis (6-4 6-4). During the match Karol scored 62 points vs Berankis’s 44. Milos was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Karol made 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Milos Karol was very effective on serve to win 86% (31/36) of his 1st serve and 83% (10/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Milos broke Berankis twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Milos’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Vienna,M15 Pardubice,M15 Trnava and M25 Trnava.
Milos has a compiled 50-28 win-loss record in 2024, 21-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Feldbausch | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 20 |
| Pts | 88-88 | 62-44 |
| Total Points | 176 | 106 |
| Winners | 40 | 31 |
| %Winners | 45% | 50% |
Both Feldbausch and Karol played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kilian Feldbausch lost 1 set while Milos Karol hasn’t lost a set so far. Feldbausch has played 1 set more than Karol (3 vs 2). Therefore, Feldbausch played 9 games more than Karol. The Swiss scored 40 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovakian made 31 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Feldbausch | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 10 |
| 1st in | 54/81 | 36/48 |
| %1st in | 67% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 31/36 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 10/12 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 83% |
Feldbausch managed to score 3 aces . Karol scored 10 aces . Feldbausch won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Karol won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 83% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Feldbausch | Karol |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 60% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Kilian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kilian dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Milos broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Karol was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Feldbausch | |||
| Q1 Sels |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 88-88 | 88-88 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 54/81 | 54/81 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 40/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 14/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Karol | |||
| Q1 Berankis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 62-44 | 62-44 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/48 | 36/48 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 31/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/12 | 10/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLLWW
LLWLWWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Maxime ChazalChazal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
