Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Lukas Klein will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Belgrade Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 4:00 pm on GRANDSTAND. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Martin Etcheverry is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.62
Lukas Klein -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Lukas Klein
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Lukas Klein since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
32 - 29win/loss
39
27
LWLWLLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-30 | 7-10 | 19-13 | 5-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-29 | 8-11 | 25-14 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-33 | 4-5 | 48-25 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-29 | 0-2 | 62-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 26-15 | 0-1 | 24-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 39, Etcheverry got to the 2nd round after beating Pavel Kotov 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Tomas Martin had a good straight sets win against Kotov (6-3 6-4). During the match, Etcheverry scored 66 points vs Kotov’s 48. Tomas Martin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Etcheverry bagged 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tomas Martin Etcheverry conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Etcheverry put 79% of his first serves in, winning 80% (37/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (6/12) on the 2nd serve. Tomas Martin broke Kotov twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Etcheverry has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (339-199). 5-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Etcheverry has a compiled9-6 match record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Tomas Martin’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Lyon.
The Argentine has an aggregate 32-29 win-loss record in 2024, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Belgrade
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Lukas Klein
32 - 23win/loss
136
109
LWWWWLWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-24 | 16-10 | 9-7 | 5-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-29 | 9-8 | 15-12 | 11-6 | 1-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 44-22 | 5-0 | 27-17 | 8-3 | 3-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 0-2 | 23-17 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-15 | 1-1 | 4-5 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 153, the Slovakian reached the 2nd round after defeating Yannick Hanfmann 6-4 6-4, Jozef Kovalik 3-6 6-3 6-1 and James Duckworth 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Klein had a good straight sets win against Duckworth (6-4 6-2). During the match Klein scored 69 points vs Duckworth’s 49. The Slovakian was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Klein made 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lukas Klein lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Klein put 60% of his first serves in, winning 70% (19/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the 2nd serve. The Slovakian broke Duckworth 5 times after converting 24% of his break points (5/21).
Lukas has a compiled 32-23 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Etcheverry | Klein |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 63 |
| Pts | 66-48 | 215-175 |
| Total Points | 114 | 390 |
| Winners | 37 | 92 |
| %Winners | 56% | 43% |
Etcheverry played 1 match while Klein competed in 3 matches. Klein started his run from the qualifications while Etcheverry had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Lukas Klein lost 1 set while Tomas Martin Etcheverry hasn’t conceded a set so far. Etcheverry has played 5 set(s) less than Klein (2 vs 7). Therefore, Etcheverry played 44 games less than Klein. Tomas Martin scored 37 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, Lukas recorded 92 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Etcheverry | Klein |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 6.7 |
| 1st in | 46/58 | 128/183 |
| %1st in | 79% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 37/46 | 92/128 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 33/55 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 60% |
Etcheverry scored 5 aces . Klein recorded 20 aces (6.7 per match). Etcheverry won 80% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Klein won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Etcheverry | Klein |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 12 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 12/32 |
| % Converted | 29% | 38% |
| Conceded | 4 | 13 |
| Saved | 4 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Etcheverry broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Tomas Martin very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 4 break points. Lukas broke his opponents 12 times with a 38% conversion rate. Klein conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Etcheverry | |||
| R1 Kotov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 66-48 | 66-48 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 56% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 46/58 | 46/58 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 37/46 | 37/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Klein | |||||
| Q1 Hanfmann |
Q3 Kovalik |
R1 Duckworth |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 18 | 63 | |
| pts | 61-51 | 85-75 | 69-49 | 215-175 | |
| Total points | 112 | 160 | 118 | 390 | |
| Winners | 35 | 38 | 19 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 45% | 28% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 8 | 5 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 46/60 | 55/78 | 27/45 | 128/183 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 71% | 60% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 38/55 | 19/27 | 92/128 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 69% | 70% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 12/23 | 11/18 | 33/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 52% | 61% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/8 | 5/21 | 12/32 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 63% | 24% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 4/6 | 2/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 50% | 217% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLWL
LWWWWLWLLW Tennis Scores in Belgrade
- Marin CilicCilic – Alexandre MullerMuller (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (6-76 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Branko DjuricDjuric (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Mariano NavoneNavone (6-0 7-63) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Pavel KotovKotov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Luciano DarderiDarderi (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Juncheng ShangShang (2-6 7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jamie Murray/John PeersMurray/John Peers – James Duckworth/Christopher O’ConnellDuckworth/Christopher O’Connell (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Mariano NavoneNavone (6-0 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Branko DjuricDjuric (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Pavel KotovKotov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Alexandre MullerMuller (7-6(2) 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Luciano DarderiDarderi (7-6(1) 6-3) – See score progression
- Christopher O’ConnellO’Connell – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (6-7(6) 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Fabio FogniniFognini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Tommy PaulPaul (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Dusan LajovicLajovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
