Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Kasidit Samrej will face off in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.21
Kasidit Samrej -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Kasidit Samrej
This will be the 2nd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Kasidit Samrej fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Lam Coleman Wong (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Lam Coleman Wong won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger back in September 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
37 - 31win/loss
157
128
LWLWWLLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-32 | 35-23 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 157, Chak got to the 2nd round after defeating Yan Bai 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Lam Coleman Wong defeated Bai (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 78 points vs Bai’s 69. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong recorded 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 65% of his first serves in, winning 79% (41/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Bai 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (128-95). 35-22 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has an overall105-68 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Chak’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Chak has a compiled 37-31 win-loss record in 2024, 35-22 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Kasidit Samrej
35 - 20win/loss
469
469
LWWWWLLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-21 | 34-18 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-16 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 469 (career-high), the Thai got to the 2nd round after defeating Seung Min Lee 6-2 6-1, Kris Van Wyk 6-3 6-4 and Julian Ocleppo 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Kasidit had a good straight sets win against Ocleppo (6-1 6-4). During the match Samrej scored 64 points vs Ocleppo’s 41. Samrej was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Samrej scored 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kasidit Samrej lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Samrej put 73% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 73% (11/15) on the 2nd serve. Kasidit broke Ocleppo 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Samrej’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat and M25 Nakhon Si Thammarat.
Samrej has a composed 35-20 win-loss record in 2024, 33-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 51 |
| Pts | 78-69 | 200-134 |
| Total Points | 147 | 334 |
| Winners | 41 | 79 |
| %Winners | 53% | 40% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match while Samrej competed in 3 matches. Samrej started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 1 set while Kasidit Samrej hasn’t conceded a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 3 set(s) less than Samrej (3 vs 6). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 24 games less than Samrej. Chak scored 41 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Kasidit managed to score 79 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 52/80 | 106/169 |
| %1st in | 65% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 79/106 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 39/63 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 62% |
Lam Coleman Wong fired 6 aces . Samrej scored 12 aces (4 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 79% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Samrej won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 12 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 12/24 |
| % Converted | 75% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 17 |
| Saved | 3 | 15 |
| % Saved | 60% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Kasidit broke his opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kasidit conceded his serve twice and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Bai |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 78-69 | 78-69 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 52/80 | 52/80 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 41/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Samrej | |||||
| Q1 Min |
Q3 Van |
R1 Ocleppo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 19 | 17 | 51 | |
| pts | 59-29 | 77-64 | 64-41 | 200-134 | |
| Total points | 88 | 141 | 105 | 334 | |
| Winners | 21 | 31 | 27 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 40% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 23/39 | 43/75 | 40/55 | 106/169 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 57% | 73% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 21/23 | 31/43 | 27/40 | 79/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 72% | 68% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 18/32 | 11/15 | 39/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 56% | 73% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 3/8 | 4/6 | 12/24 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 38% | 67% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 11 | 5 | 17 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 10/11 | 4/5 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 91% | 80% | 271% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLLWW
LWWWWLLLWW Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Alexander BlockxBlockx (7-67 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jurij RodionovJurij – Sho ShimabukuroSho (7-6(3) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Kaito UesugiUesugi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
