Patrick Kypson and Mark Lajal will fight against each other in the quarter of the Sioux Falls Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mark Lajal is the pick to win this match.
Mark Lajal -> 1.74
Patrick Kypson -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Mark Lajal
There is no head to head record between Patrick Kypson and Mark Lajal since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Patrick Kypson
22 - 24win/loss
213
133
LWWLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, Kypson reached the quarter after beating Ethan Quinn 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 and Aidan Mayo 7-6(5) 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Mayo (7-65 6-2). During the match, Kypson scored 74 points vs Mayo’s 59. Patrick was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kypson bagged 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Patrick Kypson was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (30/40) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Mayo 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Patrick has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Kypson has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (203-122). 8-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kypson has a composed 35-17 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Cleveland Challenger where he defeated Ethan Quinn in the final 4-6 6-3 6-2.
The American has an overall 22-23 win-loss record in 2024, 8-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sioux Falls Challenger
Patrick has never competed in this tournament before.
Mark Lajal
34 - 26win/loss
226
191
LLWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 224, the Estonian reached the quarter after beating Omni Kumar 6-2 6-0 and Zachary Svajda 3-6 6-2 6-0.
In the 2nd round against Svajda, The Estonian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-0). During the match Lajal scored 83 points vs Svajda’s 61. The Estonian was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Lajal managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Mark Lajal was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (30/40) of his 1st serve and 65% (20/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Estonian broke Svajda 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Estonian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 60% of the points he played.
The Estonian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Zhangjiagang Challenger.
Lajal has an aggregate 33-26 win-loss record in 2024, 10-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kypson | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 52 | 37 |
| Pts | 177-145 | 139-92 |
| Total Points | 322 | 231 |
| Winners | 75 | 47 |
| %Winners | 42% | 34% |
Both Kypson and Lajal played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Patrick Kypson dropped 1 set, while Mark Lajal dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Kypson and Lajal have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Kypson played 15 games more than Lajal. The American scored 75 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Estonian recorded 47 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kypson | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 101/166 | 63/112 |
| %1st in | 61% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 75/101 | 47/63 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 40/65 | 30/49 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 61% |
Kypson managed to score 20 aces (10 per match). Lajal managed to score 11 aces (5.5 per match). Kypson won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Lajal won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kypson | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 11 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 11/15 |
| % Converted | 55% | 73% |
| Conceded | 9 | 4 |
| Saved | 7 | 2 |
| % Saved | 78% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kypson broke his opponents 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Patrick dropped his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Lajal broke his opponents 11 times with a 73% conversion rate. Mark conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kypson | ||||
| R1 Quinn |
R2 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-75 6-3 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 21 | 52 | |
| pts | 103-86 | 74-59 | 177-145 | |
| Total points | 189 | 133 | 322 | |
| Winners | 45 | 30 | 75 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 41% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 14 | 6 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 61/103 | 40/63 | 101/166 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 45/61 | 30/40 | 75/101 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 75% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/42 | 14/23 | 40/65 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 61% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/6 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 50% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 1/2 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 50% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Lajal | ||||
| R1 Kumar |
R2 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 23 | 37 | |
| pts | 56-31 | 83-61 | 139-92 | |
| Total points | 87 | 144 | 231 | |
| Winners | 17 | 30 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 36% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 9 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 23/41 | 40/71 | 63/112 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 17/23 | 30/40 | 47/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 20/31 | 30/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 65% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 5/7 | 11/15 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 71% | 73% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 67% | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLWW
LLWWLWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Borna GojoGojo (1-1) – H2H and prediction
