Taro Daniel and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will play each other in the quarter of the Taipei 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 6:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Taro Daniel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Taro Daniel is the pick to win this match.
Taro Daniel -> 1.54
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Taro Daniel vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
This will be the 2nd time that Taro Daniel and Chak Lam Coleman Wong clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Lam Coleman Wong (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Lam Coleman Wong won 4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 in the semifinal in the Playford Challenger back in 2023.
Taro Daniel
21 - 31win/loss
84
58
LWWWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-33 | 16-16 | 5-11 | 9-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-30 | 34-16 | 7-10 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 27-17 | 12-7 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-25 | 5-7 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-15 | 9-9 | 3-5 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 89, the Japanese reached the quarter after beating Alafia Ayeni 7-6(5) 6-3 and Benoit Paire 6-2 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Paire (6-2 6-4). During the match, Daniel scored 56 points vs Paire’s 44. Daniel was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Daniel managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Taro Daniel was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (25/32) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Japanese broke Paire 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Japanese hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Daniel has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (358-282). 3-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Daniel has a composed 34-28 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Taro’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in Auckland.
The Japanese has a compiled 21-31 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei 2 Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
36 - 30win/loss
170
128
LWLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 145, Chak got to the quarter after beating Sanhui Shin 6-4 3-6 6-1 and Kuan-Yi Lee 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Chak defeated Lee (6-1 6-73 6-3). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 99 points vs Lee’s 76. Lam Coleman Wong was quite aggressive to blast 49 winners.
About the serving games, Lam Coleman Wong overwhelmed his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally effective on serve to win 91% (49/54) of his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Chak broke Lee 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Chak has an aggregate 36-30 win-loss record in 2024, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Daniel | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 55 |
| Pts | 138-114 | 185-157 |
| Total Points | 252 | 342 |
| Winners | 55 | 78 |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% |
Both Daniel and Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 2 sets while Taro Daniel hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Daniel has played 2 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (4 vs 6). Therefore, Daniel played 15 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. Taro scored 55 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Chak managed to score 78 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Daniel | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 32 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 16 |
| 1st in | 74/127 | 100/179 |
| %1st in | 58% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 55/74 | 78/100 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 34/53 | 44/79 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 56% |
Daniel recorded 7 aces (3.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong scored 32 aces (16 per match). Daniel won 74% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Daniel | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 60% | 58% |
| Conceded | 5 | 13 |
| Saved | 4 | 11 |
| % Saved | 80% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Japanese broke his opponents 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Daniel dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Chak conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Daniel | ||||
| R1 Ayeni |
R2 Paire |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 | 40 | |
| pts | 82-70 | 56-44 | 138-114 | |
| Total points | 152 | 100 | 252 | |
| Winners | 30 | 25 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 45% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 42/75 | 32/52 | 74/127 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 62% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 25/32 | 55/74 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 78% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/33 | 14/20 | 34/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 70% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Shin |
R2 Lee |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | 6-1 6-73 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 29 | 55 | |
| pts | 86-81 | 99-76 | 185-157 | |
| Total points | 167 | 175 | 342 | |
| Winners | 29 | 49 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 49% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 11 | 21 | 32 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 46/92 | 54/87 | 100/179 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 62% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 29/46 | 49/54 | 78/100 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 91% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/46 | 17/33 | 44/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 52% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/5 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 60% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 4/4 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 100% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
LWLWWLLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-1) – H2H and prediction
