Kyle Edmund and Colton Smith will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Sioux Falls Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 7:30 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.67
Colton Smith -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kyle Edmund vs. Colton Smith
There is no head to head record between Kyle Edmund and Colton Smith since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Kyle Edmund
37 - 23win/loss
350
14
WLWLWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-23 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 24-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 334, Edmund reached the 2nd round after defeating Maks Kasnikowski 6-7(7) 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round against Kasnikowski, Edmund recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-77 6-4 6-1). During the match, Edmund scored 109 points vs Kasnikowski’s 92. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Edmund made 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Kyle Edmund was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (44/58) of his 1st serve and 53% (21/40) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Brit broke Kasnikowski 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Edmund has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (247-169). 23-8 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Edmund has an overall 58-25 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Kyle’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
The Brit has an aggregate 37-22 win-loss record in 2024, 23-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sioux Falls Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Colton Smith
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-9 | 22-7 | 0-0 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 496 (career-high), the American reached the 2nd round after beating Martin Damm 5-7 7-6(3) 6-1.
In the 1st round against Damm, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-63 6-1). During the match Smith scored 103 points vs Damm’s 82. Smith was pretty aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Smith blasted 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Colton Smith was quite effective on serve to win 77% (50/65) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Colton broke Damm 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Smith’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Los Angeles,M25 Dallas and M25 Champaign.
The American has a composed 29-8 win-loss record in 2024, 7-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Edmund | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 32 |
| Pts | 109-92 | 103-82 |
| Total Points | 201 | 185 |
| Winners | 44 | 50 |
| %Winners | 40% | 49% |
Both Edmund and Smith played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Kyle Edmund surrendered 1 set, while Colton Smith conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Edmund and Smith have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Edmund played 2 games less than Smith. Edmund scored 44 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Smith made 50 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Edmund | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 10 |
| 1st in | 58/98 | 65/89 |
| %1st in | 59% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 44/58 | 50/65 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 21/40 | 15/24 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 63% |
Edmund fired 9 aces . Smith made 10 aces . Edmund won 76% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Smith won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Edmund | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 55% | 60% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Edmund broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Kyle lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Smith broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Smith conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Edmund | |||
| R1 Kasnikowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-77 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 109-92 | 109-92 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 58/98 | 58/98 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 44/58 | 44/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/40 | 21/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Smith | |||
| R1 Damm |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-63 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 103-82 | 103-82 | |
| Total points | 185 | 185 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 65/89 | 65/89 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 50/65 | 50/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLWWWWLW
LWWWWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Sioux Falls Challenger
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Matthew ForbesForbes (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Cooper WoestendickWoestendick (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-77 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Andres MartinMartin (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Omni KumarKumar (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-3 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Martin DammDamm (5-7 7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Ozan BarisBaris – Alastair GrayGray (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-63 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
