Ethan Quinn and Rudy Quan will face off in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on TAD TAUBE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.49
Rudy Quan -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ethan Quinn vs. Rudy Quan
There is no head to head record between Ethan Quinn and Rudy Quan since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ethan Quinn
26 - 30win/loss
202
202
WWWWWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 235, Ethan got to the 2nd round after defeating Carl Emil Overbeck 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, Ethan had a good straight sets win against Emil Overbeck (6-3 6-0). During the match, Quinn scored 52 points vs Emil Overbeck’s 27. Quinn was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Quinn couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Ethan Quinn was pretty effective on serve to win 91% (21/23) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Quinn broke Emil Overbeck 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Quinn has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 56% of his matches (80-63). 16-17 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Quinn has an aggregate53-38 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Ethan’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
Ethan has an aggregate 25-30 win-loss record in 2024, 16-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Rudy Quan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-10 | 12-5 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-11 | 13-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 797 (career-high), Rudy reached the 2nd round after beating Patrick Zahraj 7-5 6-1, Keegan Smith 6-3 6-0 and Guy Den Ouden 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Den Ouden, Quan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Quan scored 90 points vs Den Ouden’s 81. Rudy was pretty aggressive to blast 52 winners.
About the serving games, Quan wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Rudy Quan lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Quan put 78% of his first serves in, winning 72% (52/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Den Ouden 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Orange Park.
The American has a composed 18-8 win-loss record in 2024, 12-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Quinn | Quan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 62 |
| Pts | 52-27 | 225-171 |
| Total Points | 79 | 396 |
| Winners | 21 | 108 |
| %Winners | 40% | 48% |
Quinn played 1 match while Quan competed in 3 matches. Quan started his run from the qualifications while Quinn had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Rudy Quan conceded 1 set while Ethan Quinn hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Quinn has played 5 set(s) less than Quan (2 vs 7). Therefore, Quinn played 47 games less than Quan. The American scored 21 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Rudy fired 108 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Quinn | Quan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0.3 |
| 1st in | 23/36 | 155/211 |
| %1st in | 64% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 21/23 | 108/155 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 33/56 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 59% |
Quinn didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Quan fired 1 ace (0.3 per match). Quinn won 91% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Quan won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Quinn | Quan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 12 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 12/19 |
| % Converted | 63% | 63% |
| Conceded | 0 | 19 |
| Saved | 0 | 15 |
| % Saved | 0% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Quinn had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponents 12 times with a 63% conversion rate. Rudy conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Quinn | |||
| R1 Emil |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 52-27 | 52-27 | |
| Total points | 79 | 79 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/36 | 23/36 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 21/23 | 21/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Quan | |||||
| Q1 Zahraj |
Q3 Smith |
R1 Den |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | 6-3 6-0 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 15 | 28 | 62 | |
| pts | 74-53 | 61-37 | 90-81 | 225-171 | |
| Total points | 127 | 98 | 171 | 396 | |
| Winners | 27 | 29 | 52 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 48% | 58% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/65 | 42/54 | 72/92 | 155/211 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 78% | 78% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 27/41 | 29/42 | 52/72 | 108/155 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 69% | 72% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 9/12 | 9/20 | 33/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 75% | 45% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/6 | 3/5 | 12/19 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 67% | 60% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 | 8 | 19 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 3/3 | 6/8 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 100% | 75% | 250% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLLWWL
LLWWWLWWLL Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bernard TomicTomic – Max BasingBasing (4-6 7-61 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Learner TienTien – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
