Tristan Schoolkate and Jack Pinnington Jones will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on KENNEDY-GROSSMAN. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Pinnington Jones who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Pinnington Jones is the pick to win this match.
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.78
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Jack Pinnington Jones
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Jack Pinnington Jones since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
36 - 28win/loss
168
167
LLLWWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, the Australian reached the 2nd round after beating Guy Den Ouden 6-3 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Tristan had a good straight sets win against Den Ouden (6-3 7-65). During the match, Schoolkate scored 73 points vs Den Ouden’s 62. Tristan was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schoolkate managed to score 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Tristan Schoolkate was very efficient on serve to win 74% (32/43) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Den Ouden twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Schoolkate has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (162-115). 30-19 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has a compiled102-74 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Guangzhou Challenger where he beat Adam Walton in the final 6-3 3-6 6-3.
The Australian has an overall 36-27 win-loss record in 2024, 30-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Jack Pinnington Jones
26 - 9win/loss
377
376
LWWLLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 452 (career-high), Jack reached the 2nd round after beating Aidan Mayo 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, Pinnington had a good straight sets win against Mayo (6-2 6-3). During the match Pinnington scored 67 points vs Mayo’s 50. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Pinnington recorded 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Jack Pinnington Jones was quite effective on serve to win 86% (19/22) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Pinnington broke Mayo 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Jack’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Aldershot.
Pinnington has a compiled 25-9 win-loss record in 2024, 19-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 |
| Pts | 73-62 | 67-50 |
| Total Points | 135 | 117 |
| Winners | 32 | 19 |
| %Winners | 44% | 28% |
Both Schoolkate and Pinnington played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Schoolkate and Pinnington have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Schoolkate played 5 games more than Pinnington. Tristan scored 32 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Pinnington bagged 19 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 4 |
| 1st in | 43/67 | 22/46 |
| %1st in | 64% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 19/22 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 14/24 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 58% |
Schoolkate blasted 12 aces . Pinnington recorded 4 aces . Schoolkate won 74% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Pinnington won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 4/13 |
| % Converted | 50% | 31% |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 75% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Jack was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Schoolkate | |||
| R1 Den |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 73-62 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/67 | 43/67 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Pinnington | |||
| R1 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 22/46 | 22/46 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 19/22 | 19/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLWWL
LWWLLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Christian LangmoLangmo (3-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Dane SweenySweeny (6-2 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Ethan QuinnQuinn (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Dominic StrickerStricker (3-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Govind NandaNanda (7-67 6-1) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Andres AndradeAndrade (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Ozan BarisBaris (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Carl Emil OverbeckEmil Overbeck (7-64 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Karue SellSell – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Aidan MayoMayo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Kaylan BigunBigun (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Ethan QuinnQuinn (7-5 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Andres AndradeAndrade (6-1 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-4 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Ozan BarisBaris (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Christian LangmoLangmo (3-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Dominic StrickerStricker (3-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Dane SweenySweeny (6-2 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Govind NandaNanda (7-6(7) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Karue SellSell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
