Nishesh Basavareddy and Edas Butvilas will face off in the final of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 12:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nishesh Basavareddy who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nishesh Basavareddy is the pick to win this match.
Nishesh Basavareddy -> 1.32
Edas Butvilas -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nishesh Basavareddy vs. Edas Butvilas
There is no head to head record between Nishesh Basavareddy and Edas Butvilas since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Nishesh Basavareddy
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-18 | 34-11 | 0-0 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-6 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 227 (career-high), Nishesh reached the final after beating Alex Rybakov 4-6 6-4 6-4, Ethan Quinn 6-2 7-5, Jeff Wolf 7-5 6-2 and Christopher Eubanks 6-4 7-6(5).
In the semifinal, Basavareddy had a good straight sets win against Eubanks (6-4 7-65). During the match, Basavareddy scored 76 points vs Eubanks’s 67. Basavareddy was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Basavareddy recorded 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Nishesh Basavareddy lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Basavareddy put 68% of his first serves in, winning 81% (38/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Nishesh broke Eubanks twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Basavareddy has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Basavareddy has a solid win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 65% of his matches (41-22). 24-10 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Basavareddy has an overall35-16 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Calabasas and the Bloomfield Hills Challenger.
Nishesh has a compiled 27-11 win-loss record in 2024, 24-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Basavareddy has never competed in this tournament before.
Edas Butvilas
52 - 20win/loss
252
249
LLWLLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 54-26 | 28-12 | 26-11 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 9-9 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 365 (career-high), the Lithuanian reached the final after defeating Sawyer Severance 6-1 6-0, James Kent Trotter 6-2 2-6 7-5, Tristan Schoolkate 7-6(7) 6-4, Bernard Tomic 3-6 6-3 6-2 and Tristan Boyer 6-4 6-3.
In the semifinal, Butvilas had a good straight sets win against Boyer (6-4 6-3). During the match Butvilas scored 76 points vs Boyer’s 60. Butvilas was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Butvilas recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Edas Butvilas was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (26/34) of his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Edas broke Boyer 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Edas started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Edas’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion,M15 Kursumlijska Banja,M25 La Nucia and Nova.
Edas has an aggregate 51-20 win-loss record in 2024, 26-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Basavareddy | Butvilas |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 12 |
| Tot Games | 93 | 109 |
| Pts | 324-272 | 377-309 |
| Total Points | 596 | 686 |
| Winners | 129 | 148 |
| %Winners | 40% | 39% |
Basavareddy played 4 matches while Butvilas competed in 5 matches. Butvilas started his run from the qualifications while Basavareddy had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Nishesh Basavareddy surrendered 1 set, while Edas Butvilas dropped 2 sets. Basavareddy has played 3 set(s) less than Butvilas (9 vs 12). Therefore, Basavareddy played 16 games less than Butvilas. The American scored 129 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Lithuanian recorded 148 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Basavareddy | Butvilas |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 32 |
| Avg per match | 2.5 | 6.4 |
| 1st in | 169/278 | 197/332 |
| %1st in | 61% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 129/169 | 148/197 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 55/109 | 71/135 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 53% |
Basavareddy managed to score 10 aces (2.5 per match). Butvilas recorded 32 aces (6.4 per match). Basavareddy won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Butvilas won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Basavareddy | Butvilas |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 21 |
| Converted | 15/37 | 21/41 |
| % Converted | 41% | 51% |
| Conceded | 13 | 26 |
| Saved | 6 | 17 |
| % Saved | 46% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 9 |
Nishesh broke his opponents 15 times with a 41% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded. The Lithuanian broke his opponents 21 times with a 51% conversion rate. Butvilas conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Basavareddy | ||||||
| R1 Rybakov |
R2 Quinn |
1/4 Wolf |
1/2 Eubanks |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 7-5 | 7-5 6-2 | 6-4 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 20 | 20 | 23 | 93 | |
| pts | 105-95 | 76-62 | 67-48 | 76-67 | 324-272 | |
| Total points | 200 | 138 | 115 | 143 | 596 | |
| Winners | 39 | 24 | 28 | 38 | 129 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 32% | 42% | 50% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 53/98 | 32/58 | 37/53 | 47/69 | 169/278 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 55% | 70% | 68% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 24/32 | 28/37 | 38/47 | 129/169 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 75% | 76% | 81% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/45 | 13/26 | 10/16 | 11/22 | 55/109 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 50% | 63% | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 5/10 | 4/9 | 2/8 | 15/37 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Butvilas | ||||||||
| Q1 Severance |
Q3 Rybakov |
R1 Kent |
R2 Schoolkate |
1/4 Tomic |
1/2 Boyer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-72 7-5 7-5 | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | 7-67 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 15 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 37 | 28 | 23 | 26 | 19 | 146 | |
| pts | 53-20 | – | 86-83 | 84-79 | 78-67 | 76-60 | 377-309 | |
| Total points | 73 | 0 | 169 | 163 | 145 | 136 | 686 | |
| Winners | 18 | 31 | 38 | 35 | 26 | 148 | ||
| %Winners | 34% | 0% | 36% | 45% | 45% | 34% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 3 | 32 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | ||
| 1st in | 19/38 | / | 48/86 | 51/79 | 45/70 | 34/59 | 197/332 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 0% | 56% | 65% | 64% | 58% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | / | 31/48 | 38/51 | 35/45 | 26/34 | 148/197 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 0% | 65% | 75% | 78% | 76% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | / | 20/38 | 15/28 | 14/25 | 13/25 | 71/135 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 0% | 53% | 54% | 56% | 52% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 21 | ||
| Converted | 6/9 | / | 5/9 | 2/6 | 4/6 | 4/11 | 21/41 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 0% | 56% | 33% | 67% | 36% | 51% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 26 | ||
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/ | 2/6 | 4/5 | 4/6 | 6/7 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 33% | 80% | 67% | 86% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWWLW
LLWLLLWLWW 
