Emilio Nava and Giovanni Fonio will square off in the 2nd round of the Lisbon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on COURT LISBOA. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.74
Giovanni Fonio -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Giovanni Fonio
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Giovanni Fonio since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
26 - 27win/loss
214
124
LWLWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 194, Emilio reached the 2nd round after defeating Vilius Gaubas 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Gaubas (6-4 6-3). During the match, Nava scored 68 points vs Gaubas’s 59. Emilio was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava fired 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Emilio Nava lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 70% of his first serves in, winning 77% (36/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (8/20) on the 2nd serve. Nava broke Gaubas 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Nava has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (179-127). 5-6 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Nava has a composed66-34 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The American has an aggregate 26-27 win-loss record in 2024, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lisbon Challenger
Emilio has never competed in this tournament before.
Giovanni Fonio
33 - 29win/loss
288
269
LLWWWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-31 | 9-7 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-39 | 22-12 | 28-26 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-29 | 0-0 | 40-28 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 40-20 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-7 | 8-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 300, the Italian reached the 2nd round after defeating Ryan Seggerman 6-4 6-1, Adrian Andreev 3-6 6-2 6-1 and Daniel Elahi Galan 7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, Fonio defeated Elahi Galan Riveros (7-62 4-6 7-64).During the match Fonio scored less points (4) than Elahi Galan Riveros. In fact, the world no. 194 won 98 points vs Elahi Galan Riveros’s. That means that Fonio was more focused during the important points. Giovanni was pretty aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Talking about serving, Fonio blasted 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Giovanni Fonio was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (54/74) of his 1st serve and 64% (21/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Fonio was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Elahi Galan Riveros once.
Fonio’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger and M25 Reggio Emilia.
Fonio has an overall 33-29 win-loss record in 2024, 24-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lisbon Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Fonio |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 77 |
| Pts | 68-59 | 246-213 |
| Total Points | 127 | 459 |
| Winners | 36 | 113 |
| %Winners | 53% | 46% |
Nava played 1 match while Fonio competed in 3 matches. Fonio started his run from the qualifications while Nava had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Giovanni Fonio dropped 2 sets while Emilio Nava hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nava has played 6 set(s) less than Fonio (2 vs 8). Therefore, Nava played 58 games less than Fonio. Emilio scored 36 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Giovanni scored 113 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Fonio |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 47/67 | 156/230 |
| %1st in | 70% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 36/47 | 113/156 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 48/74 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 65% |
Nava recorded 9 aces . Fonio made 17 aces (5.7 per match). Nava won 77% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Fonio won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Fonio |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 9/20 |
| % Converted | 33% | 45% |
| Conceded | 5 | 13 |
| Saved | 4 | 9 |
| % Saved | 80% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Nava broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Giovanni broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. Fonio conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| R1 Gaubas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-59 | 68-59 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 47/67 | 47/67 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 36/47 | 36/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 8/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Fonio | |||||
| Q1 Seggerman |
Q3 Andreev |
R1 Elahi Galan Riveros |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | 7-62 4-6 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 24 | 36 | 77 | |
| pts | 63-48 | 85-63 | 98-102 | 246-213 | |
| Total points | 111 | 148 | 200 | 459 | |
| Winners | 23 | 36 | 54 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 42% | 55% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 9 | 4 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 34/51 | 48/72 | 74/107 | 156/230 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | 69% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 36/48 | 54/74 | 113/156 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 75% | 73% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 15/24 | 21/33 | 48/74 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 63% | 64% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/11 | 1/1 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 36% | 100% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 3 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 6/7 | 1/3 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 86% | 33% | 186% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
LLWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Lisbon Challenger
- Emilio NavaNava – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Jaime FariaFaria (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (7-62 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Luis David Martinez/David Vega HernandezDavid Martinez/David Vega Hernandez – Jaime Faria/Henrique RochaFaria/Henrique Rocha (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Francisco Cabral/Andrea PellegrinoCabral/Andrea Pellegrino – Vlad Victor Cornea/Denys MolchanovVictor Cornea/Denys Molchanov (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Romain Arneodo/Theo ArribageArneodo/Theo Arribage – Gastao Elias/Goncalo FalcaoElias/Goncalo Falcao (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- George Goldhoff/Fernando RomboliGoldhoff/Fernando Romboli – Sergio Martos Gornes/Szymon WalkowMartos Gornes/Szymon Walkow (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Inigo Cervantes/Daniel RinconCervantes/Daniel Rincon – Marco Bortolotti/Ryan SeggermanBortolotti/Ryan Seggerman (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Sandro KoppKopp (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Timofey SkatovSkatov (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Martin KlizanKlizan (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Daniel RinconRincon (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Dennis NovakNovak (7-64 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Adrian AndreevAndreev (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Arthur GeaGea (7-5 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (4-6 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Gastao EliasElias (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Duarte ValeVale (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
