Mitchell Krueger and Mackenzie Mcdonald will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger for the 7th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mackenzie Mcdonald who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mackenzie Mcdonald is the pick to win this match.
Mackenzie Mcdonald -> 1.57
Mitchell Krueger -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Mackenzie Mcdonald
This will be the 7th time that Mitchell Krueger and Mackenzie Mcdonald play each other. The head to head is 4-2 for Mcdonald (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Krueger won 4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 in the final in the Dallas Challenger back in 2019.
Mitchell Krueger
40 - 24win/loss
146
135
LLWLLLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 142, Mitchell reached the 2nd round after defeating Yurii Dzhavakian 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Krueger had a good straight sets win against Dzhavakian (6-2 6-1). During the match, Krueger scored 54 points vs Dzhavakian’s 25. Mitchell was extremely aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Mitchell Krueger was quite efficient on serve to win 89% (17/19) of his 1st serve and 79% (11/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Dzhavakian 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Krueger has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (301-281). 29-14 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Krueger has an overall 212-172 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4 and the Little Rock Challenger where he beat Yuta Shimizu in the final 6-3 6-4.
The American has a composed 40-24 win-loss record in 2024, 29-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Mackenzie Mcdonald
11 - 19win/loss
132
37
LWLWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-23 | 18-12 | 0-4 | 3-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-30 | 23-15 | 0-6 | 4-3 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 16-16 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-26 | 15-12 | 12-5 | 9-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-16 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 172, Mackenzie got to the 2nd round after beating Thanapet Chanta 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Mcdonald had a good straight sets win against Chanta (6-3 6-1). During the match Mcdonald scored 58 points vs Chanta’s 39. Mackenzie was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Mcdonald recorded 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Mackenzie Mcdonald lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Mcdonald put 57% of his first serves in, winning 86% (25/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (8/22) on the 2nd serve. Mcdonald broke Chanta 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The American has a compiled 11-19 win-loss record in 2024, 5-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
| Pts | 54-25 | 58-39 |
| Total Points | 79 | 97 |
| Winners | 17 | 25 |
| %Winners | 31% | 43% |
Both Krueger and Mcdonald played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Krueger and Mcdonald have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Krueger played 1 game less than Mcdonald. Mitchell scored 17 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 25 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8 |
| 1st in | 19/33 | 29/51 |
| %1st in | 58% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 17/19 | 25/29 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 8/22 |
| %2nd pts | 79% | 36% |
Krueger fired 4 aces . Mcdonald managed to score 8 aces . Krueger won 89% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Mcdonald won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 63% | 56% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Mitchell broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The American very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Mcdonald broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Mackenzie conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| R1 Dzhavakian |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 54-25 | 54-25 | |
| Total points | 79 | 79 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 17/19 | 17/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Mcdonald | |||
| R1 Chanta |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-39 | 58-39 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/51 | 29/51 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 25/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 8/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLWLW
LWLWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 4 Challenger
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (7-69 6-0) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Vadym UrsuUrsu (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Yurii DzhavakianDzhavakian (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-67 7-5) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Maximilian MartererMarterer (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Thanapet ChantaChanta (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Adam WaltonWalton (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-2) – H2H and prediction
