Kyle Edmund and Tyler Zink will play each other in the qualifications of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.54
Tyler Zink -> 2.375

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Kyle Edmund vs. Tyler Zink

There is no head to head record between Kyle Edmund and Tyler Zink since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

Kyle Edmund

Kyle Edmund

29 - 20win/loss

Hard
8-7
I Hard
15-6
Clay
4-5
Grass
2-2
Rank
349
High
14
LLWWLWLWWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 39-25 8-7 4-5 25-11 2-2 0-0
2023 14-16 1-7 7-6 6-3 0-0 0-0
2022 5-5 4-4 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-0
2021 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 10-10 5-6 0-1 5-3 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 417, Kyle reached the qualifications after beating Adam Neff 3-6 6-2 6-4.

In the qualifications against Neff, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-4). During the match, Edmund scored 87 points vs Neff’s 75. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.

Talking about the service games, Edmund recorded 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kyle Edmund was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (32/37) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Edmund broke Neff 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).

Edmund has positive record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (238-167). 14-6 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Edmund has an overall 49-23 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.

Kyle’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.

Edmund has a composed 28-20 win-loss record in 2024, 14-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Columbus Challenger

Edmund has never competed in this tournament before.

Columbus Challenger
Edmund's Record

Tyler Zink

Tyler Zink

23 - 8win/loss

Hard
8-5
I Hard
6-2
Clay
9-1
Rank
497
High
497
LWWWLWWWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 31-11 13-7 9-1 9-3 0-0 0-0
2023 4-10 1-2 3-6 0-2 0-0 0-0
2022 17-14 11-11 4-2 2-1 0-0 0-0
2021 6-9 6-7 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0
2020 3-1 3-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 619 (career-high), the American reached the qualifications after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 6-4 6-7(7) 7-5.

In the qualifications, Zink defeated Kirchheimer (6-4 6-77 7-5). During the match Zink scored 125 points vs Kirchheimer’s 111. Tyler was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.

Talking about serving, Zink blasted 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tyler Zink lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Zink put 66% of his first serves in, winning 66% (50/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (20/40) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kirchheimer 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).

Tyler’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Rochester,M25 Southaven and M15 Huntsville.

Zink has an aggregate 23-7 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Columbus Challenger
Zink's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament

K.Edmund
T.Zink
1h:50
1h:50
Time on court​
2h:44
2h:44
1h:50
1h:50
Last match​
!
2h:44
2h:44
1
1
Match played
1
1
27
27
Games Played​
35
35
3
3
Set played​​
3
3
87
87
Total points​
125
125
87
87
Avg point​
125
125
32
32
Winners
50
50
32
32
Avg Winners​
50
50
37%
37%
Ratio winners
40%
40%
-- Serve --
9
9
Aces
7
7
9
9
Avg Aces
7
7
2
2
Double Faults
5
5
2
2
Avg Double Faults
5
5
32/37
32/37
1st won total​
50/76
50/76
!
86%
86%
1st won %
66%
66%
20/36
20/36
2nd won total​
20/40
20/40
56%
56%
2nd won %
50%
50%
-- Break Points --
3/8
3/8
BP won
6/14
6/14
3/8
3/8
Avg BP won
6/14
6/14
38%
38%
Won
43%
43%
2
2
Conceded
7
7
2
2
Avg Conceded
7
7
1
1
Broken
4
4
1
1
Avg Broken
4
4
1
1
Saved
3
3

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Edmund Zink
Match played 1 1
Tot Set 3 3
Tot Games 27 35
Pts 87-75 125-111
Total Points 162 236
Winners 32 50
%Winners 37% 40%

Both Edmund and Zink played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Kyle Edmund lost 1 set, while Tyler Zink surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Edmund and Zink have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Edmund played 8 games less than Zink. Kyle scored 32 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Tyler bagged 50 winners (40%).

Serve Performance

Serve Edmund Zink
Aces 9 7
Avg per match 9 7
1st in 37/73 76/116
%1st in 51% 66%
1st pts 32/37 50/76
%1st pts 86% 66%
2nd pts 20/36 20/40
%2nd pts 56% 50%

Edmund made 9 aces . Zink made 7 aces . Edmund won 86% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Zink won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Edmund Zink
Won 3 6
Converted 3/8 6/14
% Converted 38% 43%
Conceded 2 7
Saved 1 3
% Saved 50% 43%
Times Broken 1 4

Kyle broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Brit surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Tyler broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Zink conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.

Edmund
Q1
Neff
Total
Score 3-6 6-2 6-4
Tot Set 3 3
Tot Games 27 27
pts 87-75 87-75
Total points 162 162
Winners 32 32
%Winners 37% 37%
SERVE
Aces 9 9
Double Faults 2 2
1st in 37/73 37/73
% 1st in 51% 51%
1st pts 32/37 32/37
% 1st pts 86% 86%
2nd pts 20/36 20/36
% 2nd pts 56% 56%
Breaks
Won 3 3
Converted 3/8 3/8
Converted % 38% 38%
Conceded 2 2
Saved 1/2 1
Saved % 50% 50%
Times Broken 1 1
Zink
Q1
Kirchheimer
Total
Score 6-4 6-77 7-5
Tot Set 3 3
Tot Games 35 35
pts 125-111 125-111
Total points 236 236
Winners 50 50
%Winners 40% 40%
SERVE
Aces 7 7
Double Faults 5 5
1st in 76/116 76/116
% 1st in 66% 66%
1st pts 50/76 50/76
% 1st pts 66% 66%
2nd pts 20/40 20/40
% 2nd pts 50% 50%
Breaks
Won 6 6
Converted 6/14 6/14
Converted % 43% 43%
Conceded 7 7
Saved 3/7 3
Saved % 43% 43%
Times Broken 4 4

Upcoming matches in the draw