Kyle Edmund and Tyler Zink will play each other in the qualifications of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyle Edmund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyle Edmund is the pick to win this match.
Kyle Edmund -> 1.54
Tyler Zink -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kyle Edmund vs. Tyler Zink
There is no head to head record between Kyle Edmund and Tyler Zink since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kyle Edmund
29 - 20win/loss
358
14
LLWWLWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-25 | 8-7 | 4-5 | 25-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 417, Kyle reached the qualifications after beating Adam Neff 3-6 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications against Neff, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-4). During the match, Edmund scored 87 points vs Neff’s 75. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Edmund recorded 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kyle Edmund was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (32/37) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Edmund broke Neff 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Edmund has positive record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (238-167). 14-6 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Edmund has an overall 49-23 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Kyle’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
Edmund has a composed 28-20 win-loss record in 2024, 14-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Edmund has never competed in this tournament before.
Tyler Zink
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-12 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 619 (career-high), the American reached the qualifications after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 6-4 6-7(7) 7-5.
In the qualifications, Zink defeated Kirchheimer (6-4 6-77 7-5). During the match Zink scored 125 points vs Kirchheimer’s 111. Tyler was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Zink blasted 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tyler Zink lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Zink put 66% of his first serves in, winning 66% (50/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (20/40) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kirchheimer 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Tyler’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Rochester,M25 Southaven and M15 Huntsville.
Zink has an aggregate 23-7 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Edmund | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 35 |
| Pts | 87-75 | 125-111 |
| Total Points | 162 | 236 |
| Winners | 32 | 50 |
| %Winners | 37% | 40% |
Both Edmund and Zink played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Kyle Edmund lost 1 set, while Tyler Zink surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Edmund and Zink have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Edmund played 8 games less than Zink. Kyle scored 32 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Tyler bagged 50 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Edmund | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 7 |
| 1st in | 37/73 | 76/116 |
| %1st in | 51% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 50/76 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/40 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 50% |
Edmund made 9 aces . Zink made 7 aces . Edmund won 86% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Zink won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Edmund | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 6/14 |
| % Converted | 38% | 43% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Kyle broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Brit surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Tyler broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Zink conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Edmund | |||
| Q1 Neff |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 87-75 | 87-75 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/73 | 37/73 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 32/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Zink | |||
| Q1 Kirchheimer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-77 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 125-111 | 125-111 | |
| Total points | 236 | 236 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 76/116 | 76/116 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 50/76 | 50/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 20/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWWW
LLWWWLWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Tyler ZinkZink (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joshua SheehySheehy – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
