Radu Albot and Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Radu Albot who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Radu Albot is the pick to win this match.
Radu Albot -> 1.082
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul -> 6.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Radu Albot vs. Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
There is no head to head record between Radu Albot and Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Radu Albot
36 - 24win/loss
165
39
LLWWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-26 | 12-9 | 17-11 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-34 | 10-13 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-30 | 25-14 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-9 | 2-8 | 13-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-18 | 0-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 134, Albot reached the 2nd round after defeating Yaojie Zeng 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5.
In the 1st round, Radu defeated Zeng (6-4 6-72 7-5). During the match, Albot scored 117 points vs Zeng’s 99. The Moldovan was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Albot recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Radu Albot lost the serve 5 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Albot put 65% of his first serves in, winning 65% (41/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the 2nd serve. Radu broke Zeng 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Albot has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (347-290). 11-7 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Albot has a compiled 145-118 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Moldovan’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Girona Challenger.
Albot has a compiled 36-24 win-loss record in 2024, 11-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
22 - 20win/loss
672
395
LLLWLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-26 | 17-22 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-30 | 26-29 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-21 | 16-18 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-14 | 2-10 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 698, Trongcharoenchaikul got to the 2nd round after beating Toshihide Matsui 6-2 6-4, Charles Chen 7-6(5) 6-3 and Alexey Zakharov 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Wishaya had a good straight sets win against Zakharov (6-4 6-4). During the match Trongcharoenchaikul scored 75 points vs Zakharov’s 64. The Thai was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Trongcharoenchaikul recorded 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul was pretty effective on serve to win 71% (30/42) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Wishaya broke Zakharov twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Trongcharoenchaikul’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Tianjin.
Trongcharoenchaikul has an overall 22-20 win-loss record in 2024, 16-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Albot | Trongcharoenchaikul |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 60 |
| Pts | 117-99 | 210-168 |
| Total Points | 216 | 378 |
| Winners | 41 | 86 |
| %Winners | 35% | 41% |
Albot played 1 match while Trongcharoenchaikul competed in 3 matches. Trongcharoenchaikul started his run from the qualifications while Albot had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Radu Albot dropped 1 set while Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul hasn’t conceded a set so far. Albot has played 3 set(s) less than Trongcharoenchaikul (3 vs 6). Therefore, Albot played 25 games less than Trongcharoenchaikul. The Moldovan scored 41 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Thai bagged 86 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Albot | Trongcharoenchaikul |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8.3 |
| 1st in | 63/97 | 106/183 |
| %1st in | 65% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 41/63 | 86/106 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 47/77 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 61% |
Albot blasted 4 aces . Trongcharoenchaikul bagged 25 aces (8.3 per match). Albot won 65% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Trongcharoenchaikul won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Albot | Trongcharoenchaikul |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 7 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/19 |
| % Converted | 58% | 37% |
| Conceded | 6 | 15 |
| Saved | 1 | 14 |
| % Saved | 17% | 93% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Radu broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Moldovan surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 17% of the break points that he conceded. The Thai broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. Wishaya conceded his serve once and he saved 93% of the break points that he conceded.
| Albot | |||
| R1 Zeng |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-72 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 117-99 | 117-99 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 63/97 | 63/97 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 41/63 | 41/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 20/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/6 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 17% | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Trongcharoenchaikul | |||||
| Q1 Matsui |
Q3 Chen |
R1 Zakharov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-65 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 20 | 60 | |
| pts | 57-39 | 78-65 | 75-64 | 210-168 | |
| Total points | 96 | 143 | 139 | 378 | |
| Winners | 24 | 32 | 30 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% | 40% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 11 | 4 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 27/49 | 37/66 | 42/68 | 106/183 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 56% | 62% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 32/37 | 30/42 | 86/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 86% | 71% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 16/29 | 17/26 | 47/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 55% | 65% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 2/9 | 2/5 | 7/19 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 22% | 40% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 9 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 3/4 | 9/9 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 75% | 100% | 275% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLW
LLLWLLLWWW Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- Luca NardiNardi – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (6-2 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong (6-1 5-7 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Paul JubbJubb (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yan BaiBai (3-6 7-63 0-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Terence AtmaneAtmane (1-0) – H2H and prediction
