![Prediction And Head To Head Sebastian Fanselow Vs. Andrew Paulson O6cy8p8gvw Prediction and head to head Sebastian Fanselow vs. Andrew Paulson](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Sebastian-Fanselow-vs.-Andrew-Paulson-o6cy8p8GVW.jpg)
Sebastian Fanselow and Andrew Paulson will play each other in the 1st round of the Szczecin Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrew Paulson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andrew Paulson is the pick to win this match.
Andrew Paulson -> 1.27
Sebastian Fanselow -> 3.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sebastian Fanselow vs. Andrew Paulson
This will be the 2nd time that Sebastian Fanselow and Andrew Paulson face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Fanselow (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Fanselow won 6-2 7-5 in the qualifications in the Karlsruhe Challenger back in 2023.
Sebastian Fanselow
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Sebastian Fanselow](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/8394Sebastian-Fanselow.jpg)
24 - 29win/loss
331
273
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-29 | 7-9 | 9-14 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 56-31 | 24-9 | 20-15 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-31 | 5-11 | 17-13 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-28 | 17-13 | 13-11 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 34-15 | 34-13 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 331, Fanselow reached the 1st round after beating Andrej Martin 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Fanselow has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (333-226). 9-14 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Fanselow has a composed 102-82 record in the last years on clay.
Sebastian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Trnava.
Fanselow has a compiled 24-29 win-loss record in 2024, 9-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Fanselow has never competed in this tournament before.
Andrew Paulson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-22 | 1-3 | 31-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
2022 | 53-27 | 6-3 | 30-15 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2021 | 47-26 | 19-8 | 11-11 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 345, Andrew got to the 1st round after beating Marko Topo 6-3 6-3 and Alessandro Giannessi 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Giannessi (6-2 6-4). During the match Paulson scored 63 points vs Giannessi’s 42. Andrew was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Paulson bagged 9 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Andrew Paulson was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 91% (31/34) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Paulson broke Giannessi 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 58% of the points he played.
The Czech’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Cordenons Challenger.
The Czech has an aggregate 13-6 win-loss record in 2024, 13-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Fanselow | Paulson |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 3 | 4 |
Tot Games | 27 | 36 |
Pts | 90-79 | 125-91 |
Total Points | 169 | 216 |
Winners | 43 | 60 |
%Winners | 48% | 48% |
Fanselow played 1 match while Paulson competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Sebastian Fanselow surrendered 1 set while Andrew Paulson hasn’t lost a set so far. Fanselow has played 1 set(s) less than Paulson (3 vs 4). Therefore, Fanselow played 9 games less than Paulson. Sebastian scored 43 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech made 60 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Fanselow | Paulson |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 15 |
Avg per match | 3 | 7.5 |
1st in | 58/89 | 68/100 |
%1st in | 65% | 68% |
1st pts | 43/58 | 60/68 |
%1st pts | 74% | 88% |
2nd pts | 15/31 | 16/32 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 50% |
Fanselow managed to score 3 aces . Paulson bagged 15 aces (7.5 per match). Fanselow won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Paulson won 88% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Fanselow | Paulson |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 6 |
Converted | 4/8 | 6/14 |
% Converted | 50% | 43% |
Conceded | 7 | 2 |
Saved | 5 | 2 |
% Saved | 71% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Fanselow broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The German surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Andrew broke his opponents 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Czech was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Fanselow | ||||
Q1 Martin |
Q3 Vatutin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | 54 | |
pts | 90-79 | – | 90-79 | |
Total points | 169 | 0 | 169 | |
Winners | 43 | 43 | ||
%Winners | 48% | 0% | 48% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | ||
1st in | 58/89 | / | 58/89 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 0% | 65% | |
1st pts | 43/58 | / | 43/58 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 0% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 15/31 | / | 15/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 0% | 48% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | ||
Converted | 4/8 | / | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | ||
Saved | 5/7 | 0/ | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | – | 36% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Paulson | ||||
Q1 Topo |
Q3 Giannessi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 36 | |
pts | 62-49 | 63-42 | 125-91 | |
Total points | 111 | 105 | 216 | |
Winners | 29 | 31 | 60 | |
%Winners | 47% | 49% | 48% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | 9 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
1st in | 34/55 | 34/45 | 68/100 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 76% | 68% | |
1st pts | 29/34 | 31/34 | 60/68 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 91% | 88% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 6/11 | 16/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 55% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/10 | 6/14 | |
Converted % | 75% | 30% | 43% | |
Conceded | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 0/0 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Szczecin Challenger
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-3 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-3 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (6-2 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (7-63 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dennis NovakNovak – Tomasz BerkietaBerkieta (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Pedro CachinCachin (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (2-6 7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico CoriaCoria – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-0 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Lucas GerchGerch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Federico CoriaCoria (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-1) – H2H and prediction