Terence Atmane and Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Terence Atmane is the pick to win this match.
Terence Atmane -> 1.088
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong -> 6.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Terence Atmane
30 - 26win/loss
157
118
WLWWLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-31 | 30-20 | 5-5 | 2-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 138, Terence got to the 2nd round after defeating Rio Noguchi 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Noguchi (6-3 6-4). During the match, Atmane scored 65 points vs Noguchi’s 48. Terence was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Atmane made 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Terence Atmane was pretty effective on serve to win 81% (26/32) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player broke Noguchi 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Atmane has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (195-117). 22-15 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Atmane has an overall151-78 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The French player best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Granby Challenger.
Terence has a compiled 30-26 win-loss record in 2024, 22-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
23 - 20win/loss
636
636
LLWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-26 | 28-23 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-28 | 34-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 704 (career-high), Mitsuki got to the 2nd round after defeating Zhan Zheng 6-4 6-1, Zhenxiong Dong 4-6 6-2 7-5 and Kaichi Uchida 4-6 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round against Uchida, The Malaysian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-2). During the match Wei Kang Leong scored 93 points vs Uchida’s 76. Mitsuki was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Wei Kang Leong scored 13 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Wei Kang Leong put 64% of his first serves in, winning 84% (43/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (11/29) on the 2nd serve. Mitsuki broke Uchida 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Mitsuki’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat.
Mitsuki has an overall 23-20 win-loss record in 2024, 22-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
The Malaysian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Atmane | Wei Kang Leong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 73 |
| Pts | 65-48 | 253-211 |
| Total Points | 113 | 464 |
| Winners | 26 | 114 |
| %Winners | 40% | 45% |
Atmane played 1 match while Wei Kang Leong competed in 3 matches. Wei Kang Leong started his run from the qualifications while Atmane had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong lost 2 sets while Terence Atmane hasn’t conceded a set so far. Atmane has played 6 set(s) less than Wei Kang Leong (2 vs 8). Therefore, Atmane played 54 games less than Wei Kang Leong. Terence scored 26 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Wei Kang Leong struck 114 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Atmane | Wei Kang Leong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 7 |
| 1st in | 32/51 | 145/227 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 114/145 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 37/82 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 45% |
Atmane bagged 9 aces . Wei Kang Leong blasted 21 aces (7 per match). Atmane won 81% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Wei Kang Leong won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Atmane | Wei Kang Leong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 12 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 12/23 |
| % Converted | 25% | 52% |
| Conceded | 2 | 17 |
| Saved | 1 | 13 |
| % Saved | 50% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Atmane broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Terence lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Malaysian broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Mitsuki conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Atmane | |||
| R1 Noguchi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 65-48 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/51 | 32/51 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 26/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Wei Kang Leong | |||||
| Q1 Zheng |
Q3 Dong |
R1 Uchida |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 30 | 26 | 73 | |
| pts | 58-41 | 102-94 | 93-76 | 253-211 | |
| Total points | 99 | 196 | 169 | 464 | |
| Winners | 26 | 45 | 43 | 114 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 44% | 46% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 6 | 13 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 8 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 32/47 | 62/100 | 51/80 | 145/227 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 62% | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 45/62 | 43/51 | 114/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 73% | 84% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 19/38 | 11/29 | 37/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 50% | 38% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/9 | 4/6 | 12/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 44% | 67% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 11 | 4 | 17 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 9/11 | 3/4 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 82% | 75% | 207% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLLWWWL
LLWWLWWLWW Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- James McCabeMcCabe – Rishab AgarwalAgarwal (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ye Cong MoCong Mo – Markos KalovelonisKalovelonis (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Maxime CressyCressy (7-610 6-3) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongWei Kang Leong – Kaichi UchidaUchida (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Yaojie ZengZeng (6-4 6-72 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Jie CuiCui (6-4 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Vadym UrsuUrsu (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Yan BaiBai – Blake MottMott (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Linang XiaoXiao (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher O’ConnellO’Connell – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ye Cong MoCong Mo – Markos KalovelonisKalovelonis (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Yaojie ZengZeng (6-4 6-7(2) 7-5) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Rishab AgarwalAgarwal (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yan BaiBai (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
