Omni Kumar and Murphy Cassone will face off in the qualifications of the Las Vegas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Murphy Cassone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Murphy Cassone is the pick to win this match.
Murphy Cassone -> 1.74
Omni Kumar -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Omni Kumar vs. Murphy Cassone
There is no head to head record between Omni Kumar and Murphy Cassone since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Omni Kumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-23 | 29-16 | 7-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 478, Omni reached the qualifications after beating Nicholas Godsick 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Omni had a good straight sets win against Godsick (6-3 6-4). During the match, Kumar scored 70 points vs Godsick’s 61. Kumar was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kumar fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Omni Kumar lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kumar put 57% of his first serves in, winning 69% (27/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. Kumar broke Godsick 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Kumar has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (249-147). 13-12 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kumar has an aggregate238-133 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Omni’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Santo Domingo and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Kumar has a compiled 20-16 win-loss record in 2024, 13-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
Murphy Cassone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-18 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-9 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 673, Cassone got to the qualifications after defeating Justin Boulais 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Cassone had a good straight sets win against Boulais (6-2 6-3). During the match Cassone scored 61 points vs Boulais’s 41. Cassone was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Cassone fired 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Murphy Cassone was extremely effective on serve to win 89% (24/27) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Murphy broke Boulais 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Cassone’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Aldershot.
Murphy has an overall 15-12 win-loss record in 2024, 13-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kumar | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 |
| Pts | 70-61 | 61-41 |
| Total Points | 131 | 102 |
| Winners | 27 | 24 |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% |
Both Kumar and Cassone played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kumar and Cassone have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kumar played 2 games more than Cassone. Omni scored 27 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Cassone managed to score 24 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kumar | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 10 |
| 1st in | 39/68 | 27/46 |
| %1st in | 57% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 27/39 | 24/27 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 10/19 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 53% |
Kumar recorded 2 aces . Cassone recorded 10 aces . Kumar won 69% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Cassone won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kumar | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 43% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 88% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Omni broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Cassone broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Kumar | |||
| Q1 Godsick |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 70-61 | 70-61 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/68 | 39/68 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Cassone | |||
| Q1 Boulais |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 27/46 | 27/46 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 24/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWWWL
LWLWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Karue SellSell (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Collin AltamiranoAltamirano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
