Stijn Slump and Kimmer Coppejans will play each other in the qualifications of the Dobrich 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kimmer Coppejans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kimmer Coppejans is the pick to win this match.
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.52
Stijn Slump -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Stijn Slump vs. Kimmer Coppejans
There is no head to head record between Stijn Slump and Kimmer Coppejans since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Stijn Slump
40 - 16win/loss
505
505
LLWLWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-25 | 5-3 | 44-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-17 | 10-5 | 16-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-12 | 1-1 | 22-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 549, the Dutch reached the qualifications after beating Taha Baadi 6-0 3-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Baadi, Stijn had a free pass after Baadi retired on a 6-0 3-1 . scoreline.
Slump has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 66% of his matches (89-45). 35-13 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Slump has an overall73-36 win-loss record in the last 5 years on clay.
Stijn’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya and M15 Casablanca.
The Dutch has a compiled 40-16 win-loss record in 2024, 35-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Dobrich 2 Challenger
Slump has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
3 - 4win/loss
398
97
LWWLWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 14-17 | 6-5 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 624, the Belgian reached the qualifications after beating Duarte Vale 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3.
In the qualifications, Kimmer defeated Vale (6-4 6-75 6-3). During the match Coppejans scored 111 points vs Vale’s 100. Kimmer was pretty aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 52% of his first serves in, winning 77% (47/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (27/56) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Vale 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Coppejans has a composed 3-4 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Slump | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 10 | 32 |
| Pts | 41-26 | 111-100 |
| Total Points | 67 | 211 |
| Winners | 11 | 47 |
| %Winners | 27% | 42% |
Both Slump and Coppejans played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kimmer Coppejans dropped 1 set while Stijn Slump hasn’t dropped a set so far. Talking about their workload, Slump and Coppejans have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Slump played 22 games less than Coppejans. The Dutch scored 11 winners (27% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian bagged 47 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Slump | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 16/33 | 61/117 |
| %1st in | 48% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 11/16 | 47/61 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 27/56 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 48% |
Slump made 1 ace . Coppejans also bagged 5 aces . Slump won 69% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Slump | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 67% | 36% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Stijn broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Stijn quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Belgian broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Slump | |||
| Q1 Baadi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 10 | 10 | |
| pts | 41-26 | 41-26 | |
| Total points | 67 | 67 | |
| Winners | 11 | 11 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 16/33 | 16/33 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Coppejans | |||
| Q1 Vale |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 111-100 | 111-100 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 61/117 | 61/117 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 47/61 | 47/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/56 | 27/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLLWL
LWWLWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Dan MartinMartin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Corentin DenollyDenolly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Stijn SlumpSlump (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Dominik KellovskyKellovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander DonskiDonski – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Jelle SelsSels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Luca WiedenmannWiedenmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri – Adrian OetzbachOetzbach (0-0) – H2H and prediction
