Federico Agustin Gomez and Kris Van Wyk will play each other in the 2nd round of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Agustin Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Agustin Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 1.52
Kris Van Wyk -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. Kris Van Wyk
There is no head to head record between Federico Agustin Gomez and Kris Van Wyk since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Federico Agustin Gomez
48 - 19win/loss
137
135
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 59-28 | 9-7 | 50-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 182, Federico got to the 2nd round after defeating Mikalai Haliak 4-6 6-3 6-4 and Rio Noguchi 7-5 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Noguchi (7-5 7-64). During the match, Agustin Gomez scored 84 points vs Noguchi’s 80. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agustin Gomez struck 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Federico Agustin Gomez lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Agustin Gomez put 65% of his first serves in, winning 70% (37/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. Agustin Gomez broke Noguchi 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Agustin Gomez has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (157-80). 4-3 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Agustin Gomez has a compiled48-27 record in the last 4 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Milan Challenger where he overcame Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Trieste Challenger where he defeated Tomas Barrios Vera in the final 6-1 6-2.
Federico has a compiled 48-19 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Agustin Gomez has never competed in this tournament before.
Kris Van Wyk
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 65-39 | 64-38 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 55-32 | 54-30 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 52-17 | 52-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 405, Kris got to the 2nd round after beating Charles Chen 6-4 6-1, Lukas Pokorny 6-3 7-5 and Cristian Garin 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, The South African had a good straight sets win against Garin (6-3 6-1). During the match Van Wyk scored 61 points vs Garin’s 42. Kris was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Van Wyk struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Kris Van Wyk lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Van Wyk put 62% of his first serves in, winning 75% (24/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Van Wyk broke Garin 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Van Wyk’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M15 Monastir and M15 Hillcrest.
Van Wyk has an overall 44-25 win-loss record in 2024, 44-25 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Agustin Gomez | Van Wyk |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
Tot Games | 54 | 54 |
Pts | 174-158 | 203-150 |
Total Points | 332 | 353 |
Winners | 80 | 75 |
%Winners | 46% | 37% |
Agustin Gomez played 2 matches while Van Wyk competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Federico Agustin Gomez conceded 1 set while Kris Van Wyk hasn’t dropped a set so far. Agustin Gomez has played 1 set(s) less than Van Wyk (5 vs 6). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (54). Agustin Gomez scored 80 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Kris bagged 75 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Agustin Gomez | Van Wyk |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 19 |
Avg per match | 9 | 6.3 |
1st in | 114/169 | 99/174 |
%1st in | 67% | 57% |
1st pts | 80/114 | 75/99 |
%1st pts | 70% | 76% |
2nd pts | 27/55 | 40/75 |
%2nd pts | 49% | 53% |
Agustin Gomez fired 18 aces (9 per match). Van Wyk scored 19 aces (6.3 per match). Agustin Gomez won 70% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Van Wyk won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Agustin Gomez | Van Wyk |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 13 |
Converted | 8/16 | 13/25 |
% Converted | 50% | 52% |
Conceded | 15 | 9 |
Saved | 9 | 5 |
% Saved | 60% | 56% |
Times Broken | 6 | 4 |
Agustin Gomez broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. Agustin Gomez conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The South African broke his opponents 13 times with a 52% conversion rate. The South African conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
Agustin Gomez | |||||
Q1 Haliak |
Q3 Gombos |
R1 Noguchi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 18 | 25 | 72 | |
pts | 90-78 | – | 84-80 | 174-158 | |
Total points | 168 | 0 | 164 | 332 | |
Winners | 43 | 37 | 80 | ||
%Winners | 48% | 0% | 44% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 9 | 0 | 9 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||
1st in | 61/87 | / | 53/82 | 114/169 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 0% | 65% | 67% | |
1st pts | 43/61 | / | 37/53 | 80/114 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 0% | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 14/26 | / | 13/29 | 27/55 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 0% | 45% | 49% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | ||
Converted | 4/7 | / | 4/9 | 8/16 | |
Converted % | 57% | 0% | 44% | 50% | |
Conceded | 8 | 7 | 15 | ||
Saved | 5/8 | 0/ | 4/7 | 9 | |
Saved % | 63% | – | 57% | 40% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Van Wyk | |||||
Q1 Chen |
Q3 Pokorny |
R1 Garin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 21 | 16 | 54 | |
pts | 65-45 | 77-63 | 61-42 | 203-150 | |
Total points | 110 | 140 | 103 | 353 | |
Winners | 22 | 29 | 24 | 75 | |
%Winners | 34% | 38% | 39% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 8 | 5 | 19 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
1st in | 29/55 | 38/67 | 32/52 | 99/174 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 57% | 62% | 57% | |
1st pts | 22/29 | 29/38 | 24/32 | 75/99 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | 75% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/29 | 10/20 | 40/75 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 52% | 50% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/10 | 5/8 | 13/25 | |
Converted % | 57% | 40% | 63% | 52% | |
Conceded | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 5 | |
Saved % | 75% | 33% | 50% | 53% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (7-64 6-72 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Norbert GombosGombos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction