Cem Ilkel and Savva Polukhin will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Istanbul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on LIMAK COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Savva Polukhin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Savva Polukhin is the pick to win this match.
Savva Polukhin -> 1.78
Cem Ilkel -> 1.97
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Savva Polukhin
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Savva Polukhin since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Cem Ilkel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-27 | 7-13 | 4-7 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 486, Cem reached the qualifications after beating Cengiz Aksu 6-3 3-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Aksu, Ilkel had a free pass after Aksu retired on a 6-3 3-1 . scoreline.
Ilkel has winning record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (331-264). 5-9 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ilkel has a composed 195-126 record in the last years on hard.
The Turk has a composed 11-18 win-loss record in 2024, 5-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Istanbul Challenger
Savva Polukhin
35 - 11win/loss
662
614
LLLWWWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-13 | 11-6 | 24-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 6-2 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-15 | 27-9 | 16-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-5 | 6-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 781, the Russian got to the qualifications after beating Evgeny Philippov 3-6 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Philippov, The Russian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-4). During the match Polukhin scored 90 points vs Philippov’s 87. Polukhin was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Polukhin scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Savva Polukhin lost the serve 4 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Polukhin put 59% of his first serves in, winning 61% (35/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (22/40) on the 2nd serve. Polukhin broke Philippov 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Polukhin’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Shymkent and M15 Monastir.
Polukhin has an overall 35-10 win-loss record in 2024, 11-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Istanbul Challenger
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ilkel | Polukhin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 29 |
| Pts | 43-28 | 90-87 |
| Total Points | 71 | 177 |
| Winners | 17 | 35 |
| %Winners | 40% | 39% |
Both Ilkel and Polukhin played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Savva Polukhin lost 1 set while Cem Ilkel hasn’t conceded a set so far. Talking about their workload, Ilkel and Polukhin have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Ilkel played 16 games less than Polukhin. Cem scored 17 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Polukhin made 35 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ilkel | Polukhin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 22/39 | 57/97 |
| %1st in | 56% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 35/57 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 22/40 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 55% |
Ilkel fired 3 aces . Polukhin made 1 ace . Ilkel won 77% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Polukhin won 61% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ilkel | Polukhin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 75% | 67% |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Cem broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Turk lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Savva broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Russian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ilkel | |||
| Q1 Aksu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 43-28 | 43-28 | |
| Total points | 71 | 71 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Polukhin | |||
| Q1 Philippov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 90-87 | 90-87 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 57/97 | 57/97 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 35/57 | 35/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 11/15 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLWLLW
LLLWWWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Richard BerankisBerankis (4-4) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Savva PolukhinPolukhin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandre BakshiBakshi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Koray KirciKirci – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
