Mark Lajal and Ryan Peniston will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Zhangjiagang Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mark Lajal is the pick to win this match.
Mark Lajal -> 1.53
Ryan Peniston -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mark Lajal vs. Ryan Peniston
There is no head to head record between Mark Lajal and Ryan Peniston since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Mark Lajal
21 - 20win/loss
226
191
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 247, the Estonian reached the 2nd round after defeating Philip Henning 4-6 7-5 7-6(5).
In the 1st round against Henning, Mark recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 7-65). During the match, Lajal scored 106 points vs Henning’s 105. Mark was very aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lajal recorded 15 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Mark Lajal lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lajal put 65% of his first serves in, winning 81% (52/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. Mark broke Henning 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Lajal has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 60% of his matches (118-80). 14-11 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Lajal has an aggregate79-43 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
The Estonian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Shenzhen 1 Challenger.
The Estonian has a composed 21-20 win-loss record in 2024, 14-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zhangjiagang Challenger
Lajal has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Peniston
7 - 15win/loss
543
123
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-21 | 14-13 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-29 | 20-12 | 1-8 | 7-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-26 | 4-8 | 5-4 | 13-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 47-23 | 25-9 | 12-4 | 9-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-12 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 406, Peniston got to the 2nd round after defeating Kris Van Wyk 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Van Wyk (6-4 6-4). During the match Peniston scored 67 points vs Van Wyk’s 50. Peniston was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Peniston recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Ryan Peniston was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (35/47) of his 1st serve and 67% (6/9) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Van Wyk 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Ryan has a compiled 7-15 win-loss record in 2024, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lajal | Peniston |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 35 | 20 |
Pts | 106-105 | 67-50 |
Total Points | 211 | 117 |
Winners | 52 | 35 |
%Winners | 49% | 52% |
Both Lajal and Peniston played 1 match. At the moment, Mark Lajal lost 1 set while Ryan Peniston hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lajal has played 1 set more than Peniston (3 vs 2). Therefore, Lajal played 15 games more than Peniston. The Estonian scored 52 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Ryan blasted 35 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lajal | Peniston |
---|---|---|
Aces | 15 | 2 |
Avg per match | 15 | 2 |
1st in | 64/98 | 47/56 |
%1st in | 65% | 84% |
1st pts | 52/64 | 35/47 |
%1st pts | 81% | 74% |
2nd pts | 17/34 | 6/9 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 67% |
Lajal recorded 15 aces . Peniston scored 2 aces . Lajal won 81% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Peniston won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lajal | Peniston |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/4 |
% Converted | 33% | 75% |
Conceded | 5 | 6 |
Saved | 2 | 5 |
% Saved | 40% | 83% |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
The Estonian broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Estonian lost his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Peniston broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
Lajal | |||
R1 Henning |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-5 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
pts | 106-105 | 106-105 | |
Total points | 211 | 211 | |
Winners | 52 | 52 | |
%Winners | 49% | 49% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 15 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 64/98 | 64/98 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 52/64 | 52/64 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 17/34 | 17/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Peniston | |||
R1 Van |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 52% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 47/56 | 47/56 | |
% 1st in | 84% | 84% | |
1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Zhangjiagang Challenger
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-2 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Fajing SunSun – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 6-75 6-0) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Egor AgafonovAgafonov (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Jie CuiCui – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Yibing WuWu (7-5 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Sheng TangTang – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (4-6 7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Lukas PokornyPokorny (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Yan BaiBai – Blake MottMott (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Yi ZhouZhou (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Philip HenningHenning (4-6 7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Fajing SunSun – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 6-7(5) 6-0) – See score progression
- Yan BaiBai – Blake MottMott (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yan BaiBai – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jie CuiCui – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sheng TangTang – Fajing SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (0-0) – H2H and prediction