Ji Sung Nam and Keegan Smith will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Jinan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Keegan Smith who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Keegan Smith is the pick to win this match.
Keegan Smith -> 1.87
Ji Sung Nam -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ji Sung Nam vs. Keegan Smith
There is no head to head record between Ji Sung Nam and Keegan Smith since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ji Sung Nam
10 - 10win/loss
716
236
LWWLLWWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-15 | 12-9 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-20 | 13-15 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 628, the Korean got to the 2nd round after defeating Zekai Li 6-2 6-2, Maxim Zhukov 6-3 6-4 and Dominik Palan 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3.
In the 1st round, Ji defeated Palan (6-3 6-75 6-3). During the match, Sung Nam scored 109 points vs Palan’s 95. Sung Nam was pretty aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sung Nam made 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ji Sung Nam lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Sung Nam put 59% of his first serves in, winning 67% (45/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (29/47) on the 2nd serve. Ji broke Palan 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Sung Nam has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (185-125). 8-4 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sung Nam has an aggregate 154-94 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Ji has an overall 10-9 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Jinan Challenger
Keegan Smith
24 - 15win/loss
544
339
LWLWLLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-23 | 30-18 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-26 | 31-20 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-24 | 26-14 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-5 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 639, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Seita Watanabe 6-4 6-2, Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul 6-4 6-4 and Mikalai Haliak 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Keegan had a good straight sets win against Haliak (6-4 6-1). During the match Smith scored 58 points vs Haliak’s 34. Smith was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Smith blasted 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Keegan Smith was exceptionally effective on serve to win 85% (28/33) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Smith broke Haliak 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Keegan’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Lakewood.
Smith has a composed 23-15 win-loss record in 2024, 23-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sung Nam | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 66 | 55 |
| Pts | 234-179 | 188-121 |
| Total Points | 413 | 309 |
| Winners | 87 | 86 |
| %Winners | 37% | 46% |
Both Sung Nam and Smith played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ji Sung Nam dropped 1 set while Keegan Smith hasn’t dropped a set so far. Sung Nam has played 1 set more than Smith (7 vs 6). Therefore, Sung Nam played 11 games more than Smith. The Korean scored 87 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 86 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sung Nam | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 3.3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 117/211 | 100/137 |
| %1st in | 55% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 87/117 | 86/100 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 56/94 | 28/37 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 76% |
Sung Nam made 10 aces (3.3 per match). Smith blasted 18 aces (6 per match). Sung Nam won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Smith won 86% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 76% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sung Nam | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 9 |
| Converted | 12/23 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 52% | 41% |
| Conceded | 10 | 6 |
| Saved | 6 | 5 |
| % Saved | 60% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Ji broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. The Korean lost his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Smith broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sung Nam | |||||
| Q1 Li |
Q3 Zhukov |
R1 Palan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-75 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 19 | 31 | 66 | |
| pts | 61-37 | 64-47 | 109-95 | 234-179 | |
| Total points | 98 | 111 | 204 | 413 | |
| Winners | 19 | 23 | 45 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 36% | 41% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 23/45 | 27/52 | 67/114 | 117/211 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 52% | 59% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 23/27 | 45/67 | 87/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 85% | 67% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/22 | 17/25 | 29/47 | 56/94 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 68% | 62% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 2/4 | 4/9 | 12/23 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 50% | 44% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 8 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0/0 | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 75% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| Smith | |||||
| Q1 Watanabe |
Q3 Trongcharoenchaikul |
R1 Haliak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 | 17 | 55 | |
| pts | 63-37 | 67-50 | 58-34 | 188-121 | |
| Total points | 100 | 117 | 92 | 309 | |
| Winners | 30 | 28 | 28 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 42% | 48% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 10 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/41 | 33/48 | 33/48 | 100/137 | |
| % 1st in | 83% | 69% | 69% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 30/34 | 28/33 | 28/33 | 86/100 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 85% | 85% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/7 | 13/15 | 9/15 | 28/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 86% | 87% | 60% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 2/6 | 4/9 | 9/22 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 33% | 44% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 83% | 28% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWLLL
LWLWLLWWLW Tennis Scores in Jinan Challenger
- Philip HenningPhilip – Sanhui ShinSanhui (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yibing WuWu – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ye Cong MoCong Mo – Yan BaiBai (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Woobin ShinShin – Ajeet RaiRai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
