Vit Kopriva and Hazem Naow will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 7:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vit Kopriva who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Vit Kopriva is the pick to win this match.
Vit Kopriva -> 1.48
Hazem Naow -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vit Kopriva vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Vit Kopriva and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Vit Kopriva
26 - 19win/loss
130
111
LWWWWWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-27 | 13-9 | 21-16 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-27 | 1-4 | 34-21 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 7-5 | 30-18 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-26 | 1-3 | 32-21 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 24-15 | 0-0 | 17-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 132, Kopriva got to the semifinal after beating Martyn Pawelski 6-4 6-3, Filip Peliwo 6-3 7-5 and Norbert Gombos 3-6 7-6(4) 6-1.
In the quarter against Gombos, Kopriva recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-64 6-1). During the match, Kopriva scored 93 points vs Gombos’s 86. Vit was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kopriva scored 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Vit Kopriva was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (35/49) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Vit broke Gombos 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Kopriva has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (332-232). 12-7 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kopriva has an aggregate64-45 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Czech has a composed 25-19 win-loss record in 2024, 12-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Kopriva has never competed in this tournament before.
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 340, the Syrian reached the semifinal after beating Omar Jasika 6-1 7-5, Vadym Ursu 6-0 5-1 ret. and Manuel Guinard 6-4 6-2.
In the quarter, Naow had a good straight sets win against Guinard (6-4 6-2). During the match Naow scored 67 points vs Guinard’s 57. The Syrian was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Naow bagged 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Hazem Naow lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Naow put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Hazem broke Guinard 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Hazem hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Naow’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Kish Island and M15 Metzingen.
The Syrian has an overall 35-16 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kopriva | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 69 | 49 |
| Pts | 241-203 | 199-142 |
| Total Points | 444 | 341 |
| Winners | 89 | 73 |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% |
Both Kopriva and Naow played 3 matches. At the moment, Vit Kopriva conceded 1 set while Hazem Naow hasn’t dropped a set so far. Talking about their workload, Kopriva and Naow have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Kopriva played 20 games more than Naow. Kopriva scored 89 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Syrian recorded 73 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kopriva | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3.7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 122/206 | 105/173 |
| %1st in | 59% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 89/122 | 73/105 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 42/84 | 36/68 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 53% |
Kopriva recorded 11 aces (3.7 per match). Naow fired 6 aces (2 per match). Kopriva won 73% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kopriva | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 15 |
| Converted | 14/28 | 15/23 |
| % Converted | 50% | 65% |
| Conceded | 17 | 11 |
| Saved | 10 | 8 |
| % Saved | 59% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 3 |
Vit broke his opponents 14 times with a 50% conversion rate. Vit dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded. Naow broke his opponents 15 times with a 65% conversion rate. Naow conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kopriva | |||||
| R1 Pawelski |
R2 Peliwo |
1/4 Gombos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 7-5 | 3-6 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 | 29 | 69 | |
| pts | 76-60 | 72-57 | 93-86 | 241-203 | |
| Total points | 136 | 129 | 179 | 444 | |
| Winners | 30 | 24 | 35 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 33% | 38% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 41/62 | 32/61 | 49/83 | 122/206 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 52% | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 24/32 | 35/49 | 89/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 75% | 71% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/21 | 15/29 | 19/34 | 42/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 52% | 56% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/11 | 4/8 | 14/28 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 45% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 | 4 | 17 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4/7 | 2/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 57% | 50% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Naow | |||||
| R1 Jasika |
R2 Ursu |
1/4 Guinard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | 6-0 5-1 ret. | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 12 | 18 | 49 | |
| pts | 81-59 | 51-26 | 67-57 | 199-142 | |
| Total points | 140 | 77 | 124 | 341 | |
| Winners | 25 | 18 | 30 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 35% | 45% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 37/60 | 25/42 | 43/71 | 105/173 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 60% | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 25/37 | 18/25 | 30/43 | 73/105 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 72% | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 10/17 | 13/28 | 36/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 59% | 46% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 5/5 | 4/6 | 15/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 100% | 67% | 65% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 0 | 4 | 11 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 71% | – | 75% | 49% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLWLL
Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
- Hazem NaowNaow – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Laurent LokoliLokoli (6-4 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Norbert GombosGombos (3-6 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Charles Broom/David StevensonBroom/David Stevenson – Robin Bertrand/Adolfo Daniel VallejoBertrand/Adolfo Daniel Vallejo (4-6 6-1 10-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
