Naoki Nakagawa and Christian Langmo will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Santo Domingo Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on ESTADIO MITUR. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christian Langmo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christian Langmo is the pick to win this match.
Christian Langmo -> 1.71
Naoki Nakagawa -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Naoki Nakagawa vs. Christian Langmo
This will be the 2nd time that Naoki Nakagawa and Christian Langmo play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Langmo (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Langmo won 6-4 2-6 6-4 in the quarter in M15 Cancun back in 2019.
Naoki Nakagawa
10 - 8win/loss
380
334
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-14 | 11-10 | 1-1 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-23 | 42-19 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-27 | 16-16 | 10-9 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-15 | 32-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-4 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 429, Naoki got to the qualifications after beating Enmanuel Munoz 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Nakagawa had a good straight sets win against Munoz (6-2 6-2). During the match, Nakagawa scored 68 points vs Munoz’s 49. Nakagawa was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nakagawa managed to score 8 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Naoki Nakagawa was very efficient on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Japanese broke Munoz 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Nakagawa has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (267-174). 1-0 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nakagawa has a composed 89-58 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Naoki’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Changwon and M15 Tokyo.
Nakagawa has a composed 10-7 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santo Domingo Challenger
Christian Langmo
27 - 21win/loss
465
333
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-29 | 24-21 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 471, the American got to the qualifications after beating Jossting Cruz 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Langmo had a good straight sets win against Cruz (6-2 6-1). During the match Langmo scored 60 points vs Cruz’s 36. Christian was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Langmo blasted 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Christian Langmo was very effective on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 60% (6/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Langmo broke Cruz 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Christian has an overall 26-21 win-loss record in 2024, 6-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Nakagawa | Langmo |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 16 | 15 |
Pts | 68-49 | 60-36 |
Total Points | 117 | 96 |
Winners | 23 | 23 |
%Winners | 34% | 38% |
Both Nakagawa and Langmo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nakagawa and Langmo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nakagawa played 1 game more than Langmo. Nakagawa scored 23 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Langmo fired 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Nakagawa | Langmo |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 5 |
Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
1st in | 28/57 | 29/39 |
%1st in | 49% | 74% |
1st pts | 23/28 | 23/29 |
%1st pts | 82% | 79% |
2nd pts | 16/29 | 6/10 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 60% |
Nakagawa scored 8 aces . Langmo bagged 5 aces . Nakagawa won 82% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Nakagawa | Langmo |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/11 | 5/6 |
% Converted | 36% | 83% |
Conceded | 6 | 2 |
Saved | 6 | 2 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Japanese very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 6 break points. Langmo broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Christian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Nakagawa | |||
Q1 Munoz |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 68-49 | 68-49 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 28/57 | 28/57 | |
% 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
1st pts | 23/28 | 23/28 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Langmo | |||
Q1 Cruz |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 60-36 | 60-36 | |
Total points | 96 | 96 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
1st pts | 23/29 | 23/29 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Nick HardtHardt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Facundo MenaMena (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peter BertranBertran – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Nicolas MejiaMejia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Harrison AdamsAdams (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – William GrantGrant (1-0) – H2H and prediction