Liam Draxl and Harrison Adams will play each other in the qualifications of the Santo Domingo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on ESTADIO MITUR. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Liam Draxl who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Liam Draxl is the pick to win this match.
Liam Draxl -> 1.58
Harrison Adams -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Liam Draxl vs. Harrison Adams
There is no head to head record between Liam Draxl and Harrison Adams since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Liam Draxl
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-24 | 21-10 | 17-12 | 13-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-9 | 23-5 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-16 | 16-10 | 3-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-14 | 16-9 | 12-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 267, Draxl reached the qualifications after beating Adam Neff 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Draxl had a good straight sets win against Neff (7-5 6-4). During the match, Draxl scored 61 points vs Neff’s 56. Draxl was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Draxl scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Liam Draxl lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Draxl put 67% of his first serves in, winning 61% (25/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the 2nd serve. Draxl broke Neff 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Draxl has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (129-73). 10-8 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Draxl has an overall31-17 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Draxl’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Tucuman,the Santiago Challenger and the Tyler Challenger.
Liam has a composed 19-16 win-loss record in 2024, 10-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santo Domingo Challenger
Draxl has never competed in this tournament before.
Harrison Adams
27 - 15win/loss
534
442
LLWLLWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-19 | 10-7 | 16-10 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-9 | 25-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 469, Harrison got to the qualifications after defeating Justin Boulais 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Harrison had a good straight sets win against Boulais (6-2 6-2). During the match Adams scored 69 points vs Boulais’s 47. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Adams recorded 5 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Harrison Adams was very efficient on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Adams broke Boulais 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Harrison’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Feira de Santana and M25 Mosquera.
The American has an overall 27-15 win-loss record in 2024, 16-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Draxl | Adams |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 16 |
| Pts | 61-56 | 69-47 |
| Total Points | 117 | 116 |
| Winners | 25 | 32 |
| %Winners | 41% | 46% |
Both Draxl and Adams played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Draxl and Adams have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Draxl played 6 games more than Adams. The Canadian scored 25 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Adams blasted 32 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Draxl | Adams |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 41/61 | 45/61 |
| %1st in | 67% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 25/41 | 32/45 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 10/16 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 63% |
Draxl fired 1 ace . Adams also blasted 5 aces . Draxl won 61% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Adams won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Draxl | Adams |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 63% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 |
| Saved | 5 | 5 |
| % Saved | 63% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Liam broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Draxl dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Adams broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Adams was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
| Draxl | |||
| Q1 Neff |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 61-56 | 61-56 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/61 | 41/61 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 25/41 | 25/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Adams | |||
| Q1 Boulais |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 69-47 | 69-47 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/61 | 45/61 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 32/45 | 32/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWWL
LLWLLWLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Nick HardtHardt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Facundo MenaMena (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peter BertranBertran – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Nicolas MejiaMejia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ignacio CarouCarou – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – William GrantGrant (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Harrison AdamsAdams (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – Jesse FloresFlores (0-0) – H2H and prediction
