![Prediction And Head To Head Bernarda Pera Vs. Nao Hibino Xjyxm3gksm Prediction and head to head Bernarda Pera vs. Nao Hibino](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Bernarda-Pera-vs.-Nao-Hibino-xjyXM3GksM.jpg)
Bernarda Pera and Nao Hibino will fight against each other in the qualifications of the National Bank Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 5:00 pm on Court 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernarda Pera who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernarda Pera is the pick to win this match.
Bernarda Pera -> 1.68
Nao Hibino -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernarda Pera vs. Nao Hibino
This will be the 3rd time that Bernarda Pera and Nao Hibino fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Pera and Hibino (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Pera won 6-2 6-0 in the 1st round in at the French Open back in May 2024.
Bernarda Pera
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Bernarda Pera](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Bernarda-Pera.jpg)
30 - 18win/loss
95
27
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-21 | 14-13 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 20-23 | 9-12 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-20 | 10-9 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-24 | 5-11 | 8-8 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-13 | 9-8 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 80, Bernarda got to the qualifications after defeating Miriam Bianca Bulgaru 1-6 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications against Bianca Bulgaru, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-2 6-1). During the match, Pera scored 69 points vs Bianca Bulgaru’s 59. Bernarda was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pera made 6 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Bernarda Pera lost the serve twice and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Pera put 53% of her first serves in, winning 83% (30/36) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. Pera broke Bianca Bulgaru 4 times after converting 67% of her break points (4/6).
Pera has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 57% of her matches (250-185). 13-10 on hard in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Pera has a composed86-91 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Bernarda’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Gaiba.
Pera has a composed 29-18 win-loss record in 2024, 13-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Montreal
Nao Hibino
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Nao Hibino](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Nao-Hibino.jpg)
20 - 22win/loss
143
56
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-25 | 17-15 | 2-7 | 2-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 7-21 | 1-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-10 | 9-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 159, Nao reached the qualifications after beating Katherine Sebov 6-2 2-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Japanese defeated Sebov (6-2 2-6 6-1). During the match Hibino scored 88 points vs Sebov’s 70. Hibino was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Hibino scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 7 double faults. Nao Hibino lost the serve 4 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Hibino put 54% of her first serves in, winning 63% (24/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the 2nd serve. Hibino broke Sebov 7 times after converting 50% of her break points (7/14).
The Japanese has a compiled 20-21 win-loss record in 2024, 14-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Montreal
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2016. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Pera | Hibino |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 22 | 23 |
Pts | 69-59 | 88-70 |
Total Points | 128 | 158 |
Winners | 30 | 24 |
%Winners | 43% | 27% |
Both Pera and Hibino played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Bernarda Pera conceded 1 set, while Nao Hibino conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Pera and Hibino have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Pera played 1 game less than Hibino. Bernarda scored 30 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese recorded 24 winners (27%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Pera | Hibino |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 1 |
Avg per match | 6 | 1 |
1st in | 36/68 | 38/71 |
%1st in | 53% | 54% |
1st pts | 30/36 | 24/38 |
%1st pts | 83% | 63% |
2nd pts | 15/32 | 17/33 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 52% |
Pera bagged 6 aces . Hibino blasted 1 ace . Pera won 83% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Hibino won 63% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Pera | Hibino |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 7 |
Converted | 4/6 | 7/14 |
% Converted | 67% | 50% |
Conceded | 7 | 7 |
Saved | 5 | 3 |
% Saved | 71% | 43% |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Bernarda broke her opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Pera conceded her serve twice and she saved 71% of the break points that she conceded. Hibino broke her opponent 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Nao conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 43% of the break points that she conceded.
Pera | |||
Q1 Bianca |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 69-59 | 69-59 | |
Total points | 128 | 128 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 36/68 | 36/68 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 30/36 | 30/36 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 15/32 | 15/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Hibino | |||
Q1 Sebov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 88-70 | 88-70 | |
Total points | 158 | 158 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 27% | 27% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 38/71 | 38/71 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
1st pts | 24/38 | 24/38 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 17/33 | 17/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Toronto
- Filippo AnselmiAnselmi – Giuseppe CaparcoCaparco (3-6 6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Louroi MartinezMartinez – Luca PacielloPaciello (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Christian FellineFelline (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Stacey FungFung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Kayla DayDay (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Destanee AiavaAiava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Chloe PaquetPaquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Louisa ChiricoChirico (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Magdalena FrechFrech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova (6-2) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Rebecca MarinoMarino (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Clara TausonTauson (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Katie BoulterBoulter (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction