Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez and Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi will play each other in the qualifications of the Cordenons Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on ACQUA MANIVA. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez is the pick to win this match.
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez -> 1.85
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez vs. Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
This will be the 2nd time that Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez and Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Emanuel Ambrogi (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Emanuel Ambrogi won 5-7 6-1 10-4 in the qualifications in M15 Antalya back in 2023.
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
14 - 13win/loss
562
439
WWWWWLWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-20 | 0-1 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 58-28 | 0-0 | 58-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-16 | 0-0 | 31-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-20 | 4-3 | 39-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 467, Lorenzo reached the qualifications after defeating Diego Barreto Sanchez 6-1 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Barreto Sanchez (6-1 7-63). During the match, Joaquin Rodriguez scored 72 points vs Barreto Sanchez’s 63. Lorenzo was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Joaquin Rodriguez fired 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Joaquin Rodriguez put 54% of his first serves in, winning 78% (28/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. Joaquin Rodriguez broke Barreto Sanchez 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Joaquin Rodriguez has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (146-76). 14-11 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Joaquin Rodriguez has a compiled142-72 match record in the last 4 years on clay.
Joaquin Rodriguez has a compiled 14-12 win-loss record in 2024, 14-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cordenons Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-30 | 1-3 | 41-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-23 | 0-0 | 45-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-14 | 0-1 | 29-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 513, the Argentine reached the qualifications after defeating Valerio Aboian 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Emanuel Ambrogi had a good straight sets win against Aboian (6-4 6-3). During the match Emanuel Ambrogi scored 77 points vs Aboian’s 66. Luciano was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Emanuel Ambrogi scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Emanuel Ambrogi put 68% of his first serves in, winning 68% (34/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Luciano broke Aboian 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Luciano’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Bragado.
Emanuel Ambrogi has a compiled 18-15 win-loss record in 2024, 18-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Joaquin Rodriguez | Emanuel Ambrogi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 |
| Pts | 72-63 | 77-66 |
| Total Points | 135 | 143 |
| Winners | 28 | 34 |
| %Winners | 39% | 44% |
Both Joaquin Rodriguez and Emanuel Ambrogi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Joaquin Rodriguez and Emanuel Ambrogi have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Joaquin Rodriguez played 1 game more than Emanuel Ambrogi. The Argentine scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine scored 34 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Joaquin Rodriguez | Emanuel Ambrogi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 36/67 | 50/73 |
| %1st in | 54% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 34/50 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 43% |
Joaquin Rodriguez blasted 2 aces . Emanuel Ambrogi blasted 1 ace . Joaquin Rodriguez won 78% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Emanuel Ambrogi won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Joaquin Rodriguez | Emanuel Ambrogi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 36% | 50% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Joaquin Rodriguez broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Argentine dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Luciano broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Joaquin Rodriguez | |||
| Q1 Barreto Sanchez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-63 | 72-63 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 36/67 | 36/67 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Emanuel Ambrogi | |||
| Q1 Aboian |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 77-66 | 77-66 | |
| Total points | 143 | 143 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 50/73 | 50/73 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 34/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWLLL
LLLWLWWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PicchionePicchione – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
