Emilio Nava and Li Tu will square off in the quarter of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.42
Li Tu -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Li Tu
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Li Tu since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
23 - 23win/loss
213
124
LWLWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151, Emilio got to the quarter after beating Luke Saville 6-3 6-2 and Omni Kumar 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Nava had a good straight sets win against Kumar (6-4 6-2). During the match, Nava scored 63 points vs Kumar’s 45. Emilio was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava bagged 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Nava was exceptionally effective on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nava broke Kumar 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nava hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to win 60% of the points he played.
Nava has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (176-122). 13-9 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nava has a composed85-63 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Emilio has an aggregate 23-22 win-loss record in 2024, 13-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Nava has never competed in this tournament before.
Li Tu
22 - 17win/loss
178
178
WLWLWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-25 | 31-19 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 222, Tu got to the quarter after beating Taha Baadi 1-6 6-2 6-4 and James Kent Trotter 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Kent Trotter (6-4 6-4). During the match Tu scored 62 points vs Kent Trotter’s 47. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Tu fired 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Li Tu was pretty efficient on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Kent Trotter 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Li has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Li’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Traralgon.
Li has an overall 21-17 win-loss record in 2024, 16-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 45 |
| Pts | 126-84 | 137-121 |
| Total Points | 210 | 258 |
| Winners | 50 | 64 |
| %Winners | 40% | 47% |
Both Nava and Tu played 2 matches. At the moment, Li Tu conceded 1 set while Emilio Nava hasn’t dropped a set so far. Nava has played 1 set(s) less than Tu (4 vs 5). Therefore, Nava played 10 games less than Tu. The American scored 50 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Li managed to score 64 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 24 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 59/98 | 86/133 |
| %1st in | 60% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 50/59 | 64/86 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 26/39 | 25/47 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 53% |
Nava scored 24 aces (12 per match). Tu scored 11 aces (5.5 per match). Nava won 85% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Tu won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 46% | 40% |
| Conceded | 1 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The American broke his opponents 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The American quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. Tu broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Li conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | ||||
| R1 Saville |
R2 Kumar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 35 | |
| pts | 63-39 | 63-45 | 126-84 | |
| Total points | 102 | 108 | 210 | |
| Winners | 28 | 22 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 35% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 20 | 4 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 31/45 | 28/53 | 59/98 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 53% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 22/28 | 50/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 79% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 17/25 | 26/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 68% | 67% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/6 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 50% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tu | ||||
| R1 Baadi |
R2 Kent |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 20 | 45 | |
| pts | 75-74 | 62-47 | 137-121 | |
| Total points | 149 | 109 | 258 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 52% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 47/81 | 39/52 | 86/133 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 75% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 32/39 | 64/86 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 82% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/34 | 7/13 | 25/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 54% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/8 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 38% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 2/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
WLWLWWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
