Emilio Nava and Omni Kumar will square off in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on STADIUM 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.23
Omni Kumar -> 3.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Omni Kumar
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Omni Kumar since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
23 - 22win/loss
213
124
LWLWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151, Emilio reached the 2nd round after defeating Luke Saville 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Nava had a good straight sets win against Saville (6-3 6-2). During the match, Nava scored 63 points vs Saville’s 39. Nava was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava submerged his opponent with 20 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Nava was quite efficient on serve to win 90% (28/31) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Emilio broke Saville 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Nava has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (175-122). 12-9 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nava has a composed84-63 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Emilio has a composed 22-22 win-loss record in 2024, 12-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Emilio has never competed in this tournament before.
Omni Kumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-23 | 29-16 | 7-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, Omni reached the 2nd round after beating Charles Broom 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Kumar had a good straight sets win against Broom (7-5 6-3). During the match Kumar scored 73 points vs Broom’s 64. Omni was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Kumar fired 7 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Omni Kumar lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kumar put 58% of his first serves in, winning 67% (29/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Broom 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Santo Domingo and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The American has a composed 16-11 win-loss record in 2024, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 |
| Pts | 63-39 | 73-64 |
| Total Points | 102 | 137 |
| Winners | 28 | 29 |
| %Winners | 44% | 40% |
Both Nava and Kumar played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nava and Kumar have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nava played 4 games less than Kumar. Emilio scored 28 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Kumar managed to score 29 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 20 | 7 |
| 1st in | 31/45 | 43/74 |
| %1st in | 69% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 29/43 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 14/31 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 45% |
Nava struck 20 aces . Kumar bagged 7 aces . Nava won 90% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Kumar won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 43% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Emilio broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Nava pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Kumar broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kumar conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| R1 Saville |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-39 | 63-39 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 20 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/45 | 31/45 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 28/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kumar | |||
| R1 Broom |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 73-64 | 73-64 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/74 | 43/74 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 29/43 | 29/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 14/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
LLLWLWWWWL Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Andres AndradeAndrade (4-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Liam DraxlDraxl (7-63 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Bernard TomicTomic (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
