Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Andres Andrade will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.75
Andres Andrade -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Andres Andrade
This will be the 2nd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Andres Andrade square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Andrade (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Andrade won 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in the Little Rock Challenger back in May 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
15 - 20win/loss
179
166
WLLLLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-20 | 15-13 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 179, the reached the 2nd round after beating Matias Soto 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Chak defeated Soto (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 76 points vs Soto’s 69. Chak was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored 16 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 84% (43/51) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The broke Soto twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (106-84). 15-13 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate85-59 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Chak has a composed 15-20 win-loss record in 2024, 15-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Andres Andrade
37 - 17win/loss
317
304
WLLWWLLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-17 | 10-8 | 27-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-21 | 16-10 | 7-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-12 | 15-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 317, Andrade reached the 2nd round after beating Yuta Shimizu 7-6(4) 0-6 7-6(7).
In the 1st round, The Ecuadorian defeated Shimizu (7-64 0-6 7-67).During the match Andrade scored less points (13) than Shimizu. In fact, the world no. 179 won 112 points vs Shimizu’s. That means that Andrade was more focused during the important points. The Ecuadorian was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Andrade made 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Andres Andrade lost the serve 6 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Andrade put 52% of his first serves in, winning 65% (33/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. Andrade broke Shimizu 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Andres’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Palm Coast,M25 Naples,M25 Santo Domingo,the Savannah Challenger and M25 Pensacola.
Andres has an overall 37-17 win-loss record in 2024, 10-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 32 |
| Pts | 76-69 | 112-125 |
| Total Points | 145 | 237 |
| Winners | 43 | 33 |
| %Winners | 57% | 29% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Andrade played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 1 set, while Andres Andrade dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Andrade have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 4 games less than Andrade. Chak scored 43 winners (57% of the total points). On the other side, The Ecuadorian recorded 33 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 16 | 9 |
| 1st in | 51/74 | 51/99 |
| %1st in | 69% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 43/51 | 33/51 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 24/48 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 50% |
Lam Coleman Wong recorded 16 aces . Andrade fired 9 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 84% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Andrade won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 67% | 25% |
| Conceded | 1 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Chak surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Andres broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Andres conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Soto |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 76-69 | 76-69 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 57% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 16 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 51/74 | 51/74 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 43/51 | 43/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Andrade | |||
| R1 Shimizu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 0-6 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 112-125 | 112-125 | |
| Total points | 237 | 237 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 51/99 | 51/99 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 33/51 | 33/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLLLLWWW
WLLWWLLLLW Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Aidan MchughMchugh (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Taha BaadiBaadi (1-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (7-63 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (5-7 7-5 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur GeaGea – Brandon HoltHolt (6-3 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Luke SavilleSaville (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Omni KumarKumar – Charles BroomBroom (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-64 0-6 7-67) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (7-6(3) 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
