Marco Trungelliti and Raphael Collignon will square off in the 2nd round of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Raphael Collignon who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Raphael Collignon is the pick to win this match.
Raphael Collignon -> 1.74
Marco Trungelliti -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marco Trungelliti vs. Raphael Collignon
There is no head to head record between Marco Trungelliti and Raphael Collignon since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Marco Trungelliti
37 - 17win/loss
143
112
LLWLLWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-28 | 12-11 | 31-15 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 7-8 | 30-19 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 16-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-16 | 4-2 | 20-11 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-17 | 5-2 | 6-11 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 123, Marco reached the 2nd round after beating Justin Engel 2-6 6-4 7-6(6).
In the 1st round against Engel, Marco recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 7-66).During the match, Trungelliti scored less points (2) than Engel. In fact, the world no. 123 won 103 points vs Engel’s. That means that Trungelliti was more focused during the important points. Trungelliti was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Trungelliti blasted 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Marco Trungelliti lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Trungelliti put 50% of his first serves in, winning 75% (42/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (28/57) on the 2nd serve. Trungelliti was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Engel twice.
Trungelliti has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (302-214). 30-11 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Trungelliti has an overall 211-126 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Kigali 2 Challenger where he overcame Clement Tabur in the final 6-4 6-2.
Marco has a compiled 37-17 win-loss record in 2024, 30-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Marco has never competed in this tournament before.
Raphael Collignon
45 - 13win/loss
121
121
LWWWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 72-23 | 5-3 | 46-8 | 21-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-22 | 14-4 | 38-12 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-20 | 11-11 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306, the Belgian got to the 2nd round after beating Diego Dedura-Palomero 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Collignon had a good straight sets win against Dedura-Palomero (6-4 6-4). During the match Collignon scored 76 points vs Dedura-Palomero’s 64. Raphael was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Collignon bagged 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Raphael Collignon was quite effective on serve to win 85% (28/33) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Raphael broke Dedura-Palomero twice after converting 18% of his break points (2/11).
The Belgian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Hammamet,M25 Angers,M25 Deauville,M25 Marburg and M25 Kassel.
The Belgian has a composed 45-13 win-loss record in 2024, 31-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Trungelliti | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 20 |
| Pts | 103-105 | 76-64 |
| Total Points | 208 | 140 |
| Winners | 42 | 28 |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% |
Both Trungelliti and Collignon played 1 match. At the moment, Marco Trungelliti dropped 1 set while Raphael Collignon hasn’t dropped a set so far. Trungelliti has played 1 set more than Collignon (3 vs 2). Therefore, Trungelliti played 11 games more than Collignon. Marco scored 42 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Raphael fired 28 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Trungelliti | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 8 |
| 1st in | 56/113 | 33/62 |
| %1st in | 50% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 42/56 | 28/33 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 28/57 | 16/29 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 55% |
Trungelliti recorded 2 aces . Collignon made 8 aces . Trungelliti won 75% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Collignon won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Trungelliti | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/11 |
| % Converted | 100% | 18% |
| Conceded | 11 | 5 |
| Saved | 8 | 5 |
| % Saved | 73% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Marco broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Trungelliti lost his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Raphael broke his opponent twice with a 18% conversion rate. Raphael was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
| Trungelliti | |||
| R1 Engel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 103-105 | 103-105 | |
| Total points | 208 | 208 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 56/113 | 56/113 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 42/56 | 42/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/57 | 28/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Collignon | |||
| R1 Dedura-Palomero |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 76-64 | 76-64 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 33/62 | 33/62 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 28/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/11 | 2/11 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 18% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLWLL
LWWWWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Facundo MenaMena (7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-75 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Diego Dedura-PalomeroDedura-Palomero (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Marlon VankanVankan (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-0 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Justin EngelEngel (2-6 6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (7-6(5) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Marlon VankanVankan (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Facundo MenaMena (7-6(5) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-0 6-7(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-7(5) 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Diego Dedura-PalomeroDedura-Palomero (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Clement TaburTabur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Calvin HemeryHemery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
