Henri Squire and Marko Topo will play each other in the 2nd round of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henri Squire who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henri Squire is the pick to win this match.
Henri Squire -> 1.47
Marko Topo -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Henri Squire vs. Marko Topo
There is no head to head record between Henri Squire and Marko Topo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Henri Squire
34 - 23win/loss
178
169
LWLWWLLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 184, Henri reached the 2nd round after defeating Jan Choinski 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Henri had a good straight sets win against Choinski (6-2 6-2). During the match, Squire scored 59 points vs Choinski’s 37. Squire was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Squire recorded 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Henri Squire conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 75% of his first serves in, win 94% (34/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 17% (2/12) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Choinski 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Squire has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (166-123). 17-10 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Squire has a composed83-68 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Hamburg Challenger where he defeated Clement Chidekh in the final 6-4 6-2.
The German has an overall 34-23 win-loss record in 2024, 17-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Marko Topo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-23 | 9-4 | 23-18 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 26-28 | 8-6 | 12-13 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 4-5 | 1-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 416, Marko got to the 2nd round after beating Aleksandr Braynin 6-2 2-6 6-4, Tim Ruehl 1-6 6-2 7-6(6) and Olaf Pieczkowski 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Topo had a good straight sets win against Pieczkowski (6-3 6-4). During the match Topo scored 72 points vs Pieczkowski’s 57. Marko was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Topo recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Marko Topo lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Topo put 69% of his first serves in, winning 68% (34/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. Marko broke Pieczkowski 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Marko’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Tarragona.
Marko has an overall 18-12 win-loss record in 2024, 17-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Squire | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 73 |
| Pts | 59-37 | 248-227 |
| Total Points | 96 | 475 |
| Winners | 34 | 108 |
| %Winners | 58% | 44% |
Squire played 1 match while Topo competed in 3 matches. Topo started his run from the qualifications while Squire had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Marko Topo conceded 2 sets while Henri Squire hasn’t conceded a set so far. Squire has played 6 set(s) less than Topo (2 vs 8). Therefore, Squire played 57 games less than Topo. Henri scored 34 winners (58% of the total points). On the other side, Marko recorded 108 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Squire | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 36/48 | 158/241 |
| %1st in | 75% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 34/36 | 108/158 |
| %1st pts | 94% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 2/12 | 42/83 |
| %2nd pts | 17% | 51% |
Squire scored 8 aces . Topo struck 7 aces (2.3 per match). Squire won 94% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 17% of the points. On the other side, Topo won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Squire | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 11/20 |
| % Converted | 33% | 55% |
| Conceded | 0 | 24 |
| Saved | 0 | 16 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 8 |
Henri broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Henri pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Topo broke his opponents 11 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Serbian conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Squire | |||
| R1 Choinski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-37 | 59-37 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/48 | 36/48 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 34/36 | 34/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 2/12 | 2/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 17% | 17% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Topo | |||||
| Q1 Braynin |
Q3 Ruehl |
R1 Pieczkowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | 1-6 6-2 7-66 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 28 | 19 | 73 | |
| pts | 88-84 | 88-86 | 72-57 | 248-227 | |
| Total points | 172 | 174 | 129 | 475 | |
| Winners | 42 | 32 | 34 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 36% | 47% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 62/91 | 46/78 | 50/72 | 158/241 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 59% | 69% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 42/62 | 32/46 | 34/50 | 108/158 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 70% | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/29 | 16/32 | 13/22 | 42/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 50% | 59% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/7 | 3/5 | 11/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 57% | 60% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 6 | 7 | 24 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 2/6 | 6/7 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 33% | 86% | 192% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLL
LWWLLLWWWW Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-75 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-0 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Facundo MenaMena (7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Diego Dedura-PalomeroDedura-Palomero (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Marlon VankanVankan (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Justin EngelEngel (2-6 6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (7-6(5) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Marlon VankanVankan (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Facundo MenaMena (7-6(5) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-0 6-7(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-7(5) 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Diego Dedura-PalomeroDedura-Palomero (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Clement TaburTabur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Calvin HemeryHemery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
